Posted on 09/24/2016 10:27:27 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
I’m waiting to see who MSNBC endorses.
“”A lifetimes commitment to solving problems in the real world qualifies Hillary Clinton for this job, and the country should put her to work,” the Times said of the former secretary of state and U.S. senator from New York.”
This is Junior High writing. Typically when one makes a statement as if fact it is then either followed up or what precedes is supporting evidence, thus supporting the qualifying statement.
What preciseand specific problems has she solved in “the real world” that makes he more qualified than Donald Trump?
I’m sure everyone is shocked over this unexpected event.
I crack me up.
5.56mm
Aren’t we all in total shock?
The NYTimes is a laughing stock. They’ve obviously decided that comedy could be a more profitable business model than news reporting.
Following NYT journalistic standards, this should be posted as Braking Noose.
boycott every advertiser!
Someone please list them even the smallest.
How many people actually read that toilet paper?
Why is this news? The last Republican the Slimes ever endorsed was Dwight D. Eisenhower, and that happened before I was born!
Wow, THAT’S shocker.
What a surprise.
They give no examples whatsoever to support their case.
She’s a democrat. We want her to win.
Editorial board meeting over!
Now let’s all go for some organically raised something or other that has been approved by PETA.
flotsam and jetsam
It’s probably from the Clinton family crest, where the motto reads “Donatuus, Tenacious.”
Damn! I lost that bet...<<...I did too!...but the odds were a million to one on a dollar so i bet 50 cents
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.