He’s got his schtick and making a lot of money with it... unfortunately when it comes to politics he’s biased, and obviously biased.
Go look at Trump’s trending line on his forcast page... Notice anything that happened on 9/1?
Suddenly the linear trajectory of Trump’s growth changed noticeably... even though every indicator has been since mid August Trump has not only gotten momentum, but its been growing... Even when Hillary had the worst weekend of the season from 9-9 to 9-11 he has still kept his prediction trajectory at a lower rate... why?
Simple, he’s fudging the numbers, he clearly changed his algorithm on 9/1 to make Hillary’s collapse look as bad as its been.
He’s not completely in the tank, like many others, but its clear he has biases and they are appearing in his “analysis”.
If anything since September, Trump’s odds of winning have been growing far faster then they were in August, but if you look at Nate’s “analysis” he’s consistently shown int growing at a slower rate since 9/1.
At this point Trump has clearly overtaken Hillary... anyone presenting any analysis showing otherwise is lying and manipulating. Now should Trump have a bad debate performance that might change, but short of that, he’s in the drivers seat from hear to November 8th.
At this point Trump has clearly overtaken Hillary... anyone presenting any analysis showing otherwise is lying and manipulating. Now should Trump have a bad debate performance that might change, but short of that, he’s in the drivers seat from hear to November 8th.
_______________
finally, someone sees it!