The preposterous ransom note points to the Ramseys.
The DNA in the panties points to an intruder.
The panties were huge and did not fit Jonbenet.
Patsy lied, saying she’d never seen the panties before the murder, when in fact she’d purchased them.
“The preposterous ransom note points to the Ramseys.
The DNA in the panties points to an intruder.
The panties were huge and did not fit Jonbenet.
Patsy lied, saying shed never seen the panties before the murder, when in fact shed purchased them.”
==
The DNA could have come from anyone along the “line of purchase”, as it might be termed. It exonerates nor implicates anyone, so it’s just a red herring.