$310.000 for a week? What a pinhead.
It was calculated as back fines like a library book, it sounds like.
Is she filthy rich, is this walking-around money?
The judge seemed to think she had been violating the settlement agreement for a lot longer than a week.
O’Reilly made his case, and the judge seemed to agree.
The reporting here may be the problem. They didn’t explain very well why the judge awarded just a judgement.
There must have been cause, but we’re limited to only hearing about a one week problem.
There had to be more if the judge awarded this much.
It was months. $2,500 a day. I am sure he pays millions in Child support and alimony.
Regardless of how one feels about Mr. O’Reilly, he is a man who deserves to be an equal parent in his children’s lives.
At $2,500 a day, that’s a whole lot longer than one week that she played her games. Of course, you can’t really tell much from the story - the judge may have rolled in some attorneys fees and interest. If it was just based on the days, she held out for about 4 months on allowing visitation - 124 days.
“a daily fine of $2,500 for each day of noncompliance since Oct. 11, 2015”
That’s almost a year now.
sounds to me like there were penalties because she persisted in not making up the visitation time. or, the Judge got tired of Mom’s attitude. Given the $$$ in Dad’s bank acct (and probably Mom’s), this is possibly chump change for both. Next time they need to maybe give Mom time in the County lockup? Let her think about following the Court order, or maybe it could be grounds to flip Primary conservatorship. It depends on the State law and the Judge