I think TV ad spending isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. How many people do you convert or save the 100th time you run the same ad on the same channel in the same daily newscast. Or when you run the 10th new ad.
vs
Trump’s jiu-jitsu on Friday, which was news for three days.
“I think TV ad spending isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. How many people do you convert or save the 100th time you run the same ad on the same channel in the same daily newscast. Or when you run the 10th new ad.”
Most people in this country are so-dumbed down it’s a surprise they can remember how to pee in the morning. If they hear “TRUMP IS BAD!” 100 times a day in ads, and NEVER hear “TRUMP IS GOOD!” to counter it, they’re going to simply assume Trump is bad and either vote for that evil creature Hillary or stay home.
I DVR most of what I watch anymore, and I fast forward through the ads.
“I think TV ad spending isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. How many people do you convert or save the 100th time you run the same ad on the same channel in the same daily newscast. Or when you run the 10th new ad.”
Indeed. If I was advising on political TV advertising, I’d advise money be spent on good production values, making ads that entertain and amaze, and that no ad be run more than twice in a given TV market to generate water-cooler buzz (”Did you SEE that?), impelling people wbho missed the ads to search the ads out on youtube.
Example ad: Mimic the smokey, futuristic interrogation Voight-Kampff Test scene from Blade runner, only Hillary would be the test subject, and the questions could relate to her email, health, and benghazi lies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umc9ezAyJv0