To: GingisK
This is restrictive trade practice, which is illegal. It is time for the Feds to give Microsoft the 'ole IBM/AT&T treatment.
It may very well be that in order to support the CPU Microsoft has to do work. I do not believe that the FedGov can force Microsoft to provide an upgrade. In addition, neither Intel nor AMD are obligated to do work so someone else can sell a product.
30 posted on
09/02/2016 3:39:48 PM PDT by
ronnietherocket3
(Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
To: ronnietherocket3
I don’t read this as Microsoft refusing to support old OSs on the new hardware. I read this as Microsoft having the hardware specifically made to prevent any other operating system from working with that new hardware.
42 posted on
09/02/2016 7:55:32 PM PDT by
GingisK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson