Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Not this crap again! My position on this has never changed - what people call ethanol subsidies is simply not taxing it as petroleum motor fuels. If not taxing something is a subsidy then I wish wed subsidize everything. This means everyone that pays anything but the top tax rate is subsidized. This logic says that clothes purchases with no sales tax are subsidies. Ad nauseam.

Plus a note to Jonas - how totally irrelevant are you writing about ethanol in the middle of a battle for the soul and sovereignty of the USA? Ivory tower conservatism is as useless as nipples on a bull.


26 posted on 09/02/2016 5:34:03 AM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: major-pelham

“Not this crap again! My position on this has never changed - what people call ethanol subsidies is simply not taxing it as petroleum motor fuels.”

Great, so you have no problem stopping the mandate that forces companies to add the crap?


40 posted on 09/02/2016 6:00:06 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Giggles the pig for POTUS - 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: major-pelham

Willing suspension of all disbelief. This non-taxing benefit results in a frigging MANDATE to put that sh!t in all our engines when there is NO mechanical benefit proven. That isn’t clothes, it isn’t tax credits or “no-taxing.” In my opinion, they aren’t “no-taxing;”
they are more likened to tax credits for behavior.


45 posted on 09/02/2016 6:12:58 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson