Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

The problem I see with allowing the altering of the uniforms is that it sets a precedent, and there might be other “sides” of the issue. What if a team wanted to put Black Lives Matter emblems on their uniforms? What if a team decided some gang symbol would be good to represent it?


19 posted on 08/29/2016 2:50:44 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF
That's true, but it's really much simpler than that.

Nike is the NFL's sponsor for the league's uniforms. You can be sure that their contract has very clear language that restricts what can be added to an NFL uniform.

22 posted on 08/29/2016 2:53:59 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: NEMDF

“What if a team wanted to put Black Lives Matter emblems on their uniforms? What if a team decided some gang symbol would be good to represent it?”

The NFL still has absolute control over everything about players uniforms. The small decal was almost unnoticeable but was strongly supported by the Cowboys. Allowing the Cowboys to wear it would not in any obligate the NFL to approve any other uniform change.


24 posted on 08/29/2016 2:57:54 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson