Sounds like language used by a political commissar. The view sidesteps the fact the same “good” argument may be presented by one who is educated.
Thus, with that intellectual sleight of hand (which would be easily and quickly recognized by almost any high school student of earlier years), any seemingly "good" argument that is inconsistent with the agenda must be flawed and the work of an uneducated person.
The underlying agenda, apparent to most thinkers is that, “it is important for society to discontinue allowing whites the institutionalized privilege of going to the head of the line based on the color of their skin”.
Our tax money at work.
I graduated from Binghamton University. If I make one of those "good" arguments, I wonder how how would they justify calling me uneducated? That would be a knock on themselves as well as on me.
I get fundraising calls from them about every 2-3 months. I don't answer because I recognize their number. The next time they call, however, I will answer the call and let them know what I think of this course and their school.