Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
It can't just be the result of more auto travel. I'm sure Vermont hasn't seen an 82% increase in traffic over the last few years.

Interestingly, some places saw higher fatality rates with LESS traffic a few years ago. Traffic fatality rates in New York City, for example, are generally very low because the city is so congested and it's almost impossible to lose your life in a crash during most of the day even if you're trying to kill yourself. NYC saw a spike in fatality rates a few years ago when traffic volumes declined.

23 posted on 08/24/2016 8:44:00 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

It can’t just be the result of more auto travel. I’m sure Vermont hasn’t seen an 82% increase in traffic over the last few years.

...

The article offers a plausible explanation for Vermont, too.


25 posted on 08/24/2016 8:52:09 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson