Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lou L

I understand that, but you have to realize that P-3s had better MAD booms and had the opportunity to “map” predetermined areas to plot out a map of anomalies under quiet times, very handy in comparing new data to old.

I’d think the A/C versions were counting on less sophisticated detection myself. Just a dumbass’s opinion - two cents and all that.


20 posted on 08/24/2016 7:50:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
I understand that, but you have to realize that P-3s had better MAD booms and had the opportunity to “map” predetermined areas to plot out a map of anomalies under quiet times, very handy in comparing new data to old.

It's been a number of years for me, but I understood S-3s to have MAD booms as well...probably not as large as the P-3, but probably capable.

As to the mapping point, P-3s were certainly designed with more of a "patrol" mission in mind, where S-3s were more for "on-the-spot" surveillance. An S-3 might get a sonobuoy hit, make a MAD detection, and then drop a torpedo. Their range is much less, but missions were similar.

23 posted on 08/24/2016 8:05:58 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson