Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
You probably meant him to be fired, but you stated only to have his carry rights removed. That could leave him in the field unarmed. No, I don't mean fired. Reserve that for egregious incidents. Like the dude in South Carolina shooting the 50 year old overweight black dude in the back. If he wasn't caught on film he would have got off because of the deference given to cops in the line of duty.
28 posted on 08/22/2016 12:20:54 PM PDT by Fhios (Progressives just don't know when to stop digging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Fhios

Can’t agree to having a guy unarmed still on the job.

Fire him or let him have his weapon.


30 posted on 08/22/2016 3:34:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson