[Ohioan]

The all out media attack on Donald Trump is not a sign of strength--rather of panic. I know that the media narrative also suggests that it is very late in the campaign. That is sheer bunk. Campaigns used to really get started after Labor Day. Enormous gains & losses can take place in the last few weeks of a contest--especially, where one candidate is a better communicator than the other.

There is no necessary downside in making the point you suggest with respect to Huma Abedin. It may be an item--perhaps one of many--being saved for an election eve address or one in September or October. The advantage that we have is that there is a tremendous disparity in factual ammunition. Donald Trump has an overwhelming arsenal; Mrs. Clinton has only the endless iteration of a stale, but still false narrative.

Damn the lies & Damn the liars! Elect Trump! Full speed ahead!

[justiceseeker93]

Campaigns used to really get started after Labor Day. Enormous gains & losses can take place in the last few weeks of a contest--especially, where one candidate is a better communicator than the other.

Classical example: Reagan vs. Carter, 1980.