If you believe (and read) Scott Adams of Dilbert fame, he has been doing a running commentary on Trump for a year, and up until about three weeks ago said EVERYTHING Trump was doing was brilliant marketing and brand labeling (”Lyin’ Ted,” “Crooked Hillary”) He said about three weeks ago that Hillary’s team had gained the messaging advantage, but now is back on Trump’s wagon.
I have read Adams’ commentary on Trump and am familiar with his observations about Trump’s brilliant messaging, but I don’t agree with him that the Hildabeast ever had a messaging advantage. The guy doesn’t even have the balls to admit that he supports Trump outright. Adams is a chicken shiite worried about his ass because, he says, he lives in Mexifornia, so he has to claim he supports the Hildabeast. Maybe he does and maybe he doesn’t, but this too-cute-by-half kind of bullshiite disqualifies him from consideration in my book. I much prefer the analysis and commentary by Sundance in Conservative Treehouse who has always been an unabashed Trumper who has a perfect predictive track record ever since Trump threw his hat in the ring. And Sundance states that Trump has never, ever been behind the Hildabeast and that the MSM is a pack of lying, thieving bastids from top to bottom, never to be trusted or believed, and I happen to agree with Sundance implicitly.