I have read Adams’ commentary on Trump and am familiar with his observations about Trump’s brilliant messaging, but I don’t agree with him that the Hildabeast ever had a messaging advantage. The guy doesn’t even have the balls to admit that he supports Trump outright. Adams is a chicken shiite worried about his ass because, he says, he lives in Mexifornia, so he has to claim he supports the Hildabeast. Maybe he does and maybe he doesn’t, but this too-cute-by-half kind of bullshiite disqualifies him from consideration in my book. I much prefer the analysis and commentary by Sundance in Conservative Treehouse who has always been an unabashed Trumper who has a perfect predictive track record ever since Trump threw his hat in the ring. And Sundance states that Trump has never, ever been behind the Hildabeast and that the MSM is a pack of lying, thieving bastids from top to bottom, never to be trusted or believed, and I happen to agree with Sundance implicitly.
I like him and think his “endorsement” of Cankles “for his own safety” is parody of the highest order.