athletes whose sole purpose is to generate revenues for their football or basketball programs?
so they were allowed in for the sole purpose of generating revenues for the unversity (according to your theory)...then why in the world would the university, having already profited from these people, demand a back end remuneration upon their receiving employment...? the university’s investment has already paid off...
and you haven’t answered my question...what is the difference between employment received based on athletic ability (a degree in sports, if you like), and that received through academic pursuit...both are offered and highly valued by the university...
Yes I did but you conveniently chose to ignore it. But let's get back on the track of this thread shall we?
Why do you have a problem with Title IX and scholarships to women?