Posted on 08/11/2016 8:21:17 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Revolt TV interviewed former U.S. Attorney, former Massachusetts governor and current Libertarian vice presidential candidate William Weld. Chief Political Correspondent Amrit Singh asked Weld about his views on guns. Specifically, whether or not people on the governments secret, unaccountable Terrorist Watch List should be able to purchase assault rifles. [ ]
The five shot rifle, thats a standard military rifle; the problem is if you attach a clip to it so it can fire more shells and if you remove the pin so that it becomes an automatic weapon, and those are independent criminal offenses. That is when they become, essentially a weapon of mass destruction. The problem with handguns probably is even worse than the problem of the AR15. [ ]As governor of Massachusetts when the gun control laws mentioned were implemented, Mr. Weld should know that MA doesnt ban clips. It bans ammunition magazines commonly called magazines.
Mr. Weld should know that Massachusetts magazine capacity law contains no provision regarding a magazines insertion into a rifle. Simple possession is illegal.
(Excerpt) Read more at thetruthaboutguns.com ...
Suck those communist clinton voters— just keep sucking them away!!Thank you gawd!!
An anti gun libertarian has got to be the dumbest thing I have heard about in a while.
dumb-ass.
Pins, clips and shells.
Oh, my...
“More champies, SuSu?”
To make a carbine fully automatic, all you have to do is remove a “pin”?
I thought liberaltarians had their minds right on the 2nd.
But this guy sounds like a lefty maroon. He should be sterilized.
Hey libtards....how do you like em now?
That is not a normal “libertarian” view on guns.
That’s freaking warped.
I remove the pin in my rifle from time to time, it’s a hoot. I can spray clips all over the place.\s
I know there are sane Libertarians out there somewhere, but the only ones I’ve met in person were potheads, rabidly antisemitic, just plain nuts, or a combination. Weld appears to be just your garden-variety idiot.
Leftists are delusional nitwits when it comes to exposing their ignorance of firearms and related subjects.
Weld is no libertarian, he’s a fraud candidate.
Johnson is no libertarian, either.
They’re both liberal former RINOs.
Weld has a “mind” of “unlimited stupidity”.
These two are nothing close to libertarians. Johnson at least has a few liberty-based beliefs, but Weld is a big-government Massachusetts loser.
That’s a Libertarian? The usual Libertarian argument is that the individual should be able to match the government in weaponry, an thus argue over whether strategic arms limitation treaties between the US and Russia apply to individual citizens’ nuclear arsenals or only to the governments’. < /slight exaggeration>
It appears the Libertarian Party recruited the most high profile name they could induce to sign on.
What other constitutional rights is this “libertarian” interested in regulating and restricting?
Where is this magic “Pin” this tool babbles about? Been missing out on some fun all this time?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.