Posted on 08/11/2016 11:39:00 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
OTTAWA Canadas last destroyer will be taken out of service in the spring, leaving the countrys navy reliant on allies for longer-range air defence for at least the next seven years.
HMCS Athabaskan, and similar destroyers, provided command and control capabilities over the years for the Royal Canadian Navy as well as what was called area air defence.
But Athabaskan, Canadas last destroyer, will be taken out of service within the next year, most likely in the spring, Vice-Admiral Ron Lloyd, the new commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, told Postmedia Wednesday.
Canadas warships still have the capability to protect themselves from direct, incoming air threats but will have to rely mainly on U.S. ships to deal with missiles and aircraft at longer ranges.
We wont be able to fill that long-range air defence gap, Lloyd said. You would be looking at your U.S. long-range air defence platforms for that coalition support as we go forward.
The RCN wont have that air defence capability back until about 2024 when the first of the new Canadian Surface Combatants is expected to be in the water.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalpost.com ...
Her Majesty's Canadian Ship (HMCS) ATHABASKAN alongside Sydney, Nova Scotia.
Lieutenant (N) Jarrod David Franais
“Canadas last destroyer will be taken out of service in the spring”
Darn - thought this was talking about Trudeau. I must have been dreaming.
Now is our chance.
Canada stands defenseless!
INVADE AND CONQUER!!!!!
I think they also cancelled the building of their replacement supply ship so this means Canada’s navy is a just a dedicated coast guard.
Post of the day right there!
Do they need the money for more social services and refugee resettlement? Another Western country preparing itself for submission?
Curious if they really want to be reliant on us if Hillary wins.
There’s still at least 7 Albertans, I wouldn’t attempt it yet.
“Canadas warships still have the capability to protect themselves from direct, incoming air threats but will have to rely mainly on U.S. ships to deal with missiles and aircraft at longer ranges.”
Nice of US taxpayers to take care of this for them.
Their enemies are within, like ours
Americans: Doing the jobs Canadians won't do.
Trump is right. Canada isn’t pulling their weight. Their subs are laid up and their helo fleet is Shiite. They rely on USCG for SAR.
The spousal unit is Canadian. She daily gets a ration of $#@! from her Northern friends on Facebook or on the phone about what idiots Americans are for having a candidate like Trump.
I now know why there is such passion from them. They know he is a pay to play when it comes to out-sourcing the US military for other country’s defence.
By the way, I’d be going “short” on the weird navy ship green paint if I was in that market.
Freeloaders.
Is that “green” or “gray-green” or something else ?
That rust bucket was launched in 1970. 46 years old. Recent history include equipment malfunctions, cracks in the hull, sailors being arrested for drug and gun offenses, sexual assaults, fuel spills in Halifax Harbor, “the flagship vessel in the navy’s East Coast fleet”, so says the RCN.
Canada is nothing but a target rich environment without Uncle Sam protecting their socialist asses.
I've caught some crap from canucks telling us how we should vote.
Now here's the second largest country in the world with untold natural resources and they depend on "allies" to protect them. If that's not a fourth or fifth rate country then what is? And they have the audacity to tell us what we should do!
If you up in the [not so great] White North get your wishes and Madam Benghazi takes over, you'd probably better start learning russian or chinese, because your calls for help will go to voicemail - ask Chris Stevens.
Well, maybe they’ll take a few older destroyers from Reagan’s navy off our hands...
Well if those dunderheards in Ottawa had any sense at all, they would do exactly that. We’ve got enough ships mothballed to equip most any third world country and then some, and Canada certainly qualifies for that, and it would take a damn sight less time than waiting until 2024.
This is what Trump is talking about....our “allies” need to start paying their “fair share” of defense to borrow a dim talking point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.