Obama has proven that polls ARE often correct.
I’m sorry to say, but Americans DO like corrupt, big-spending, socialist, media-supported politicians.
I’ve seen the future, and its somewhere between Brazil and Venezuela.
Obama was a lot of things, but he had wide support.
Clinton is really repulsive, to a whole huge number of voters.
I’m sorry to say, but Americans DO like corrupt, big-spending, socialist, media-supported politicians.
I think you’ve stated the problem very concisely; in the proverbial nutshell, actually...which is why a corrupt politician who is known only for her husband, and who should in fact be facing a federal trial judge is instead in possession of 240 plus electoral votes to start a POTUS election...
Trump lost major support with my co-workers last week.
He will have to be on his A-Game till Nov to gain them back.
The media loves big-spending socialist government.
They make their money from consumer spending and most of the big spending the government does is for socialist government-subsidized consumer spending.
... and the voters get their news from the media.
It’s like getting their info on cars from a commission-paid car salesman.
“I’m sorry to say, but Americans DO like corrupt, big-spending, socialist, media-supported politicians.”
So dont bother showing up in November?
What the hell is wrong with our side that people feel so damn comfortable just trying to tell people stuff like this?
I wish the Democrats had people this unhelpful.
Were the polls correct in the primaries? As I recall, none of them predicted the Trump landslides. And that’s the only reason he won. If they could have kept it close with their phony polls they would have just taken it from the people.
I’ve seen the future, and its somewhere between Brazil and Venezuela...
Of course, this means running out of beer, toilet paper, food, and then eating family pets.
“Obama has proven that polls ARE often correct.”
For the Current Occupant, maybe. He enjoyed the novelty of being a “first”, and the candidates the Republicans put up against him wanted to preserve that “legacy”. McCain even said he would “make a fine President”, while Mitt would not even TRY to close the deal, even when handed a hot-button issue like the fall of Benghazi in September 2012, which SHOULD have crippled the Current Regime almost fatally. But no, gentlemen do not do that to “helpless” victims of circumstance.
The Donald is no “gentleman” when it comes to getting the objective he is after. Time enough for that later once he has emerged victorious. Chivalry has no place on the battlefield.
But the fact it worked for the Current Occupant, does not mean that much if any of that “good will” will transfer to Herself.
Herself is just plain and simple, UNLIKABLE. ZERO empathy, and even less charisma. The Donald comes through as genuine, and he is persuasive on many levels.
You are actually correct. It’s sad, but you are.
WE are NOT QUITE there YET, however THIS IS our last stand and the people GET IT!!! Don’t you DARE give up hope YET!!! If WE lose on Nov. 8 WE ARE DONE but until then I REFUSE to give up and you shouldn’t either!!!
“Obama has proven that polls ARE often correct.”
Yeah, heard the “polls are wrong” mantra in 2004 and 2008. It’s denial and not helpful.
Yes, the polls are weighted to help Hillary, but only by a bit.
The only solution is to try harder and beat the Dhim at the grassroots voter turn out.
It's the demographics. We just don't have the numbers. All these people who believe the polls are wrong and Trump is going to win in a landslide think this is still the same country that elected Reagan twice. It ain't.