Ignore fake MSM polls, real data shows Trump on way to landslide victory

Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slander that Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!

It's evident Hillary has a hard time filling a Union Hall while Trump regularly turns people away from his stadium and arena venues.

Now this - Analysis from social media provides additional support that Trump is likely to win in a landslide.

Evidence from 'The Truth Division' shows that if you look at social media, Trump is killing Hillary!

Trump Live Stream Post -- 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views Clinton Live Stream Post --11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views

Trump has 30% more Twitter followers -- and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.

The actual numbers generated by all these polls are hidden in piles of “data.” Different people with different experiences will draw different conclusions from identical data. I sincerely hope Hillary loses in a landslide - not because I think Trump will cure the ills of this once-great nation but because I know in my heart of hearts that Hillary would do more damage than Obama already has. Therefore I simply don’t care what the polls “say.” I will vote for Trump and wild horses can’t keep me from doing so.

I’m old and this will probably be my last presidential election. If this country is to go the way of Rome I don’t want to be responsible for even one grain of sand to be thrown into its’ grave.

enthusiasm to go out and see/hear Hillary being rather limited is understandable. She is unlikeable.

I believe Hillary is going to lose several point because of her unlikeability. And many those couches potatoes and who are smoking whatever collecting government money won't be motivated enough or even forget to go the polls for Mrs. Unlikeability. How we measure that accurately is unknown, but the enthusiasm factor does favor Trump over Hillary by a lot.

Furthermore about the polling. I do know news media polls are run by liberals, globalists, and cheap labor activists. Trump scares them more than any other candidate therefore you will see their bias manifest in their polling.

Pollers: ABC (Disney), NBC (Mark Murray), CNN/ORC (Turner), CBS (Mark Rhodes) PPP (Democrats) WSJ (Murdock).

However, we all get to find out for sure on the only poll that counts on November 8th.

That poll seems to be the way I would envision doing a poll. We can all imagine the way questions are phrased by the media outlets’ polling (”Given that Trump has recently disparaged a Gold Star family, and by extension, the fallen soldier they mourn, do you think he is less likely to help families of disabled veterans receive their benefits?”).

By virtue of that poll, if I were Trump’s handlers, I’m going all economy, all combating terrorism all the time (of course, a healthy sprinkling in of Hillary’s on-the-job incompetence thrown in for good measure).

I don’t think the TV Mr Rogers was ever in combat. Nor was Trump.

I’m not some pansy cowering before Trump’s aggressive style. I found many of his personal attacks on other candidates dishonest and repulsive, and I find his liberalism hard to deal with - I don’t like voting for someone who recently approved of Hillary, Obama and DeBlasio. Trump s very happy with a much bigger government than I want, and I can remember - back in the Bill Clinton days - when Freepers thought infidelity indicated dishonesty.

But he isn’t Hillary. He doesn’t actively hate everything I love. He doesn’t hate America. He doesn’t like watching business chased overseas by our business-hating government, and he doesn’t want to bring in millions of freedom-hating socialists looking for handouts. He also understands that Islam is not “just a religion”, and bringing in millions of Muslims is destructive to freedom and America.

I have low expectations for a Trump presidency. I think he’ll promote a much bigger and much more liberal government than I want. I also believe it is every patriot’s duty to get out as many votes for him as possible, because he’s running against Hillary Clinton.

I don’t think the polls are lying. He’s under attack from the media, he has been responding badly, and a lot of Americans no longer believe in freedom or work or God. If you think Trump is a shoe-in who will sweep the vote effortlessly, you are looking at a different America and different race than what I’m seeing.

What is worrisome is that these polls, which the polling organizations have admitted they changed their polling algorithms to give far greater weight to Democrats because they were not getting the results they liked after the Republican Convention, may be an attempt to cover intentional massive voter fraud in the upcoming election.

One private organization last week called 1000 registered voters in each of the 50 states, for a sample of 50,000 registered voters, and found that only 19% said they were voting for Hillary, while 50% were planning on voting for Trump, and the balance were split between the Libertarian Johnson and the Green Party’s Stein. Granted that was not a survey of “likely to vote” people, it was a far larger sample than the 300 to 1100 sample sizes of Democrat over-sampled polls being reported in the main-stream news media, which in some polls are counting up to 50% more Democrats than Republicans and far under-sampling Independents which are trending Trump.

In the past two weeks several electronic voting machines used in the majority of states have been found by computer experts at MIT and Stanford to either be easy to hack, or, in the case of the Global Election Management System (GEMS) used in as many as seven states, including four swing states, already have found to have hidden code ALREADY imbedded in their operating software that allows the manipulation of the outcome of the election which cannot be detected without a complete manual recount of a paper ballot. Some states do not even bother to have a paper ballot that could be audited and recounts are only a re-running of the compromised software! This GEMS software was in use in the last two presidential elections and had the imbedded code present in those elections as well. . . and some anecdotal stories of such outcome manipulation by aghast poll workers was discounted by the media.

One such story came from a young college student in the last presidential election, an idealistic, Democratic poll worker was asked by a senior Democratic official who she liked in a local election during a count. The official said “Let’s give your candidate a 6% win!” and did so with a single command to the counting software! Her report on this fraud was completely discounted by the news media even though the young Democratic poll worker stated she’d be willing to take a polygraph on with voting fraud she witnessed. The county DA, also a Democrat was not interested in her report either.

If the software and machines are that easy to manipulate, widespread vote machine fraud could steal the next election in favor of Hillary and these manipulated polls could be just paving the way for a logical explanation that it was a natural consequence of the public mood, despite the social media and the numbers of people turning out for rallies NOT reflecting that mood.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.