Posted on 08/09/2016 7:36:48 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slander that Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!
It's evident Hillary has a hard time filling a Union Hall while Trump regularly turns people away from his stadium and arena venues.
Now this - Analysis from social media provides additional support that Trump is likely to win in a landslide.
So how bad is it?
Evidence from 'The Truth Division' shows that if you look at social media, Trump is killing Hillary!
Trump: 10,174,358 Likes Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes
Trump has nearly double the amount of 'Likes' that Clinton has!
When comparing recent 'live streams' on Facebook:
Trump Live Stream Post -- 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views Clinton Live Stream Post --11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views
Trump is crushing Clinton.
Trump: 10.6 million followers Hillary: 8.1 million followers
Trump has 30% more Twitter followers -- and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.
Who knows if Hillary followers are even real?
(Excerpt) Read more at overpassesforamerica.com ...
I’ve seen the future, and its somewhere between Brazil and Venezuela...
Of course, this means running out of beer, toilet paper, food, and then eating family pets.
Look I want to believe.
We wanted to believe the polls and MSM were wrong during the Obama re-election campaign - but they were right.
I hate their manipulation - but it works - so understand that we are in real trouble down 10%.
We need to get out there to correct that that apparently Trump wants to throw babies at gold star parents (or something line that)
Much of her current lead is from her advertising IMO. That’s very soft support that can easily change.
Trump will lag by a few points until he starts advertising her negatives and his positives. But that will be soft support for him too.
I expect he’ll have a ‘dash to the finish line’ ad campaign. That would be most effective and hardest for the media to counter.
So they believed a Muslim Khan job over continued support for Trump. Support then was soft. Let em have Clinton if that’s make em feel better.
Depends on what your definition of “blow out” is. With the amount of opposition (Dems, Media, NeverTrumpers, and the Tasty Cake man) all against Trump, a win of 5-7 points IS a blow out.
Are you being sarcastic ?
Remember 1980
It is a trademark of socialism/communism to trash reality and promote their own version of what they call "the truth". This is why their official newsrag is called "Pravda". That translates to "truth" from Russian.
Haha.
Nope. Trump is a nice guy. Hillary however, is sort of repulsive.
Even dems are not enthused by her.
Only snob, baby killing women could think Trump is repulsive.
His rallies are always more than half women. Republican women love Trump because he’s a man, not a wimp. Never believe the polls that say the bitch from hell is getting 30% more support from women. The only men that would think Trump is repulsive are wimps controlled by their wives, and that includes GOPe.
We need to be contacting our friends and famalies to remind them to vote. They need to start early so they get a ballot. As usual the Rats will be trying to suppress their vote.
More importantly, polling companies don’t make money by giving their customers answers they don’t want to hear...so...
Polls are so corrupt they make Hillary look honest!
McCain and Romney didn’t fight for it. They played nice. You can’t play nice with Democrats. I think they had no intention of winning. Sarah Palin even admitted that McCain threw the election away. Trump is in trouble with the GOP elite because he won’t play nice. He is aware of their corruption and they know that with a President Trump their days of corruption will be hindered. That’s why they would rather see Clinton in the WH than Trump. They all benefit from the corruption.
There is no question the “polls” show Cankles ahead.
What do you expect when you routinely-—and I mean every single poll-—oversamples Ds by anywhere from 5-10 points? If you let me do a R+10 oversample, I’ll have Trump winning CT, MI, WI, MN, and so on.
An article out today said that if you just restrict polls to “likely” voters, it’s a 2 point Cankles lead-—but even THAT article admitted it didn’t adjust for D oversamples.
Now, as to social media, it’s just like what they always said about Russia: “Russia is never as weak as she looks, Russia is never as strong as she looks.” This data doesn’t mean a great deal by itself, but it cannot be ignored, either. In 2008, Obama had a massive social media lead over McCain that was completely ignored.
Yeah the resignation crap on here $&sses me off. Thanks for calling this out.
Serious questions: isn’t toting up the number of “followers” and “likes” just another poll? So, if we’re discounting polls we don’t like, what makes this “poll” any different, and not something that should also be dismissed?
“Obama has proven that polls ARE often correct.”
For the Current Occupant, maybe. He enjoyed the novelty of being a “first”, and the candidates the Republicans put up against him wanted to preserve that “legacy”. McCain even said he would “make a fine President”, while Mitt would not even TRY to close the deal, even when handed a hot-button issue like the fall of Benghazi in September 2012, which SHOULD have crippled the Current Regime almost fatally. But no, gentlemen do not do that to “helpless” victims of circumstance.
The Donald is no “gentleman” when it comes to getting the objective he is after. Time enough for that later once he has emerged victorious. Chivalry has no place on the battlefield.
But the fact it worked for the Current Occupant, does not mean that much if any of that “good will” will transfer to Herself.
Herself is just plain and simple, UNLIKABLE. ZERO empathy, and even less charisma. The Donald comes through as genuine, and he is persuasive on many levels.
Willard didn’t get big crowds until mid to late October.
“Are you being sarcastic ?”
Absolutely!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.