Posted on 08/07/2016 4:20:41 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Aug 7th, 2016
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich; Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine; Gov. Rick Scott, R-Fla.; retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Cotton; Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani; Michael Morell, former CIA acting director.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Gov. John Kasich, R-Ohio.
lol.
That is what I thought.
SUNDAY Morning Futures (Fox) Talking about payment to Iran, seems they intended receive a ransom payment...
Sunday shows will go all out to get last swings in on Trump, while he spent this past week misfiring at the wrong targets. It’s a desperate attempt to discredit him and ruin him early just like they did Romney early in the campaign when he allowed the smears to go unanswered before he could spend campaign cash. His misfires will likely be few and far between, I suspect.
It’s a bit different this time, however. Trump has 1) always fired back—unlike Romney—and 2) Trump supporters will never be swayed by a blatant and clearly biased media.
As Rush says, the media didn’t make him and can’t break him....it’s the same with The Donald. Similarly, Rush skyrocketed to the top because someone was finally saying publicly what everyone was thinking. Same with Trump....starting with immigration/wall, jobs, terrorism / muslims, etc.
Any Trump “gaffes” don’t mean crap, past, present or future. After one more good whack from Wikilieaks showing Clinton Foundation ties and support of/with/for terrorists Trump will climb back into the lead, even in the distorted mainstream polls.
The university student poll may be too good to be true, but do we have any doubt there’s a substantial ‘Wilder’ affect distorting traditional polls ? I do not.
I guess if you were to boil it all up one take would be he was responsible for killing a lot of terror types which probably pissed off his ol' man who is a slime dog of the first degree so he knowingly did a suicide thing,hard to imagine but strange things happen.
Here's some more on his ol' man this time from Wayne Madson another brilliant researcher:
http://waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20160731
Pakistan was not a member of the U.S. coalition in Iraq, which begs the question of why the Pakistani embassy's ISI chief attended Captain Humayun Khan's funeral at Arlington? Was Khan working, through his Saudi- and Pakistani-connected father with the ISI? If so, was the contact "sanctioned" by the CIA? If not, was Humayun Khan freelancing and feeding information from Iraq to the ISI, which then passed it to their close allies in the Saudi General Intelligence Department?
Khizr Khan claims he is a "legal consultant" in Charlottesville, although he is not a member of the Virginia Bar.
Given the nature of Charlotteville's status as a sanctuary city, Khan's legal background and his work with the Muslim community in Virginia, it is likely that Khan offers help to Muslims who have overstayed their student visas in the university and sanctuary city to obtain permanent residence.
It should be recalled that seven of the 9/11 hijackers obtained Virginia driver's licenses, three of which were used as official identification to check in for flights on September 11, 2001. Perhaps if Khizr Khan had not been so willing to help dodgy Muslim "students" overstay their visas and seek workarounds to the law, Virginia might have been able to prevent the hijackers fraudulently obtain driver's licenses. And had there been no 9/11, there certainly would have been no U.S. invasion of Iraq and Humayun Khan would have realized his dream of attending the University of Virginia law school and becoming a military lawyer.
In making it easy for Saudis, Emiratis, and others to game the U.S. immigration system, Khizr Khan shares in some of the responsibility for his son's death.
This, of course, is too complicated for the two dimensional-thinking Trump. Because it is not advisable to attack any Gold Star family, Trump should have merely replied to Khizr Khan's attack by saying, "I understand the family's loss and although they attacked me, I will not respond to a grieving family." Trump could have added that Captain Khan would not have died had it not been for the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, a war for which Hillary Clinton voted as a senator. Through surrogates, Trump could have revealed the Khans' connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia law advocates, the Saudis, and the ISI.
Rudy made the point so well the media’s extreme bias in favor of dems.
I have no idea. I only started paying attention to her in the last month. I don't watch Obama either.
However, Large chunks of money can also be used to persuade/sway LIV's to get down to the booth and pull the lever, so yes, they can be translated into votes as well.(in addition to buying access and influence should the candidate win)
So...yer saying shut the sound off.
He’s works with Leon Panetta in some sort of think tank. The money trail is pretty well laundered by the time it gets to him. He’s a plotical appointee, into what is supposed to be an apolitical job. He literally worked the Benghazi incident, and defended Hillary in every way. He was never CIA chief, he was “acting.” He is as objective politically as Leon Panetta and George Stephanopolis.
How do you silence a critic ? (Morell publicly said Hillary’s server was surely compromised and our enemies have all the contents.)
Hire him.
Oh my!
Georgie’s next fresh insight will be his first.
Walking around money and people to hand it out, you bet it works. Gratitude for good precinct results for the precinct workers too.
And I also agree that there is a subtantial population of squishy people, soccer moms, teachers, and so on. These are not critical thinkers. Every decision made by these people is last minute, and follows the emotion.
http://www.thecanary.co/2016/07/29/paris-strikes-astonishing-partnership-secret-isis-sponsor-ties-hillary-clinton/
.........provided key services for the covert arms export network that supplied Saddam Hussein. To prevent exposure of that secret supply line, and collateral damage to Hillary Clinton who joined Lafarge board in 1990, just as the arms pipeline was being shut down the Justice Department was told to bury the investigation But investigators from other US government agencies who worked on the case say they were waved off whenever they got too close to exposing the direct involvement of the intelligence community in the arms export scheme. Lafarge remains close to the Clintons to this day. In 2013, Lafarges Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric Olson, was a featured attendee at the Clinton Global Initiatives annual meeting.
The company is a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation the firms up to $100,000 donation was listed in its annual donor list for 2015. Lafarge is also listed again as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for the first quarter of 2016.
Lafarge is a major beneficiary of disaster capitalism in Iraq, dominating a market where Iraqs infrastructure remains in dire need of hundreds of billions of dollars in investment. The company describes itself as one of the largest non-oil investors in Iraq.
The firm is not just an economic juggernaut. Its murky history of intelligence ties, and significant political clout in France and the US the countries leading the airstrikes against Isis in Syria raise the question of whether Lafarge believes it can profit from terror without accountability.
Bottom line there is so much in the deleted 30,000 emails that Assange has it should remove her form any consideration of any voter but you know how that goes.
Maybe, but ANYONE that served is a hero to me, let alone killed in war, even if it was by an IED.
It’s the Captain’s father that is a political, hack-used prostitute.
Jeff Flake was on before that, being a Flake. I think the heat and UV rays fry brains. Arizona gives us crappy politicians.
And speaking of money laundering, if Iran couldn’t be paid in US currency, why would it be alright to convert the currency than pay, something isn’t right with that either.
Outside of this forum, and a few others visited by political junkies such as us, I dare say most voters are represented by your sentence above.
Emotion is a powerful force, and not very well controlled by most, and in deft hands can be manipulated easily without a seam showing.
That is why money is the mother's milk of politics, it helps to reach the afore mentioned voters.
Voters being played like violins, and too stupid, or simply ignorant and non caring, to realize they are being used.
Politics, in a nutshell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.