I keep getting called angry, but anger isn’t really what’s going on.
I’m being analytical.
The leadership we’ve had and the directions they’ve taken have been abysmal. To do more of the same is to beat my head against the brick wall expecting a different result.
These folks haven’t had just one chance; they’ve had a two or three DECADES of chances.
They have utterly failed.
Therefore, any finally sane analysis would say CHANGE the leadership. The most important position is at the top, and then work your way down.
Personally, I think I could randomly select about 600 people from my contiguous rural counties and have better leadership than we have in the administration, congress, and judiciary.
Not anger. I’m an analytical realist.
I found this excerpt to be most telling. It's not a failing on the part of government to follow the will of the people. It's a deliberate plan of action for control that has been sytematically carried over for the past century.
Four plus...
|
Are you still killing your unborn? -- GOD |
“Personally, I think I could randomly select about 600 people from my contiguous rural counties and have better leadership than we have in the administration, congress, and judiciary.”
I don’t know you, don’t have a clue what rural counties you speak of and have no idea what method of selection you might have in mind but I am certain you are right and that says it all about what is wrong with this country.