Posted on 07/28/2016 6:48:20 AM PDT by AJFavish
gavone!...................... or a real orchuche/drajule (Phonetic spelling).
Beat me to it...
The military didn’t trust nor like her husband. Why would they trust her?
Maybe she formed a bond with them when she landed under sniper fire. Oh, wait...
I was stationed at Travis AFB, CA in the early 90s. AF1 would often land to refuel when returning from the far east.
On two separate occasions they asked for volunteers to “catch” and refuel the plane arriving later that day. Something you’d think an airman would be honored to do. On both occasions they wound up needing to select the “volunteers”.
When was that? He has, since the 1990's been a Clintonoid. He sold his soul to them long ago...
the infowarrior
That soldier grasping the Hillary paw with his fingers crossed just published a new book, “My Ten Years on K.P.”
;^)
It’s been common knowledge since Bubba took office in 1993 that “the Clintons loathe the military”.
bttt
It’s ok. She said the security of the guys in Benghazi was ‘not her ball to carry’.
When the going gets tough, Hillary is reviewing Youtube videos, looking for an excuse.
I’ll have to check that book out. He wouldn’t release his name at the time the photo was taken.
And contrast that to when Dubya was in office. The Daily Dose of Dubya thread here on FR had hundreds of photos with beaming soldiers standing next to the President.
re: the night of the Benghazi attacks
Panetta deserves massive blame for the lack of response, he was the freakin’ Secy of Defense and right in the chain of command from the White House.
In trying to prop up Shrillary he continues to try to cover up his own shameless malfeasance. The call came, and neither Shrillary nor Panetta nor Obama “had the backs” of all our people in Benghazi.
Obama has claimed that he ordered forces to be deployed, and Panetta has NEVER been forced to explain whether Obama really gave that order (thus Panetta or someone the chain ignored it), or is it Obama that is lying? Or possibly some combination, i.e., Obama may well have given a more ambiguous “order” but in any case Panetta was Secy of Defense and failed utterly to ensure that necessary forces were deployed.
As has rarely been pointed out, it was not only 4 lives that were being sacrificed, for we very nearly lost close to 40 ppl and only the heroic measures by a small number on the scene prevented the much bigger bloodbath that Hillary, Panetta, and Obama had allowed.
Panetta should NOT have been getting a pass all this time.
Not the current serving Marines I’ve talked to.....
Indeed she does. That makes it easier to stab them in the backs.
I think Gowdy said Panetta was less than truthful in his testimony. He is a weasel. Maybe someday we’ll find out, as Gowdy says, one wheel was not put in motion headed toward Benghazi. We shouldn’t have to wait though. Outrageous that anyone associated with making any decisions on that night is a candidate for the presidency.
My guess is Obama gave an ambiguous order but a follow up had to be confirmed and he was unavailable for the rest of the night. Kind of like the time Clinton was on the golf course and refused to take the call requesting to take out Bin Laden
Someone hold my hat cause I have to go bitch slap this lying pos
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.