This is just the first bounce after the Republican convention. He will get another 10 point bounce after the democratic convention. It’s hot in Philly and by Thursday they will be rioting in the streets after Hillary’s coronation.
I’m not comfortable with that lead though. This is a woman who has just been exposed as much as anybody could ever be exposed as corrupt as it gets - Her husband meets with Lynch and she skates from the law, obvious as hell what happened there. And then the email leaks proving Trump absolutely 100% right that the game was rigged against Sanders. And he’s only up by 5 percentage points? He should be SLAUGHTERING her right about now!!! He should be at least above 50% with her down below 40. How is this possible? What else does this woman have to do to eff up her campaign? Behead kittens on live TV? This is unbelievable. Can you imagine what Trumps poll numbers would be if the roles were reversed? It just boggles the mind the support this woman gets, I really think her supporters are zombies, they just do not care about the candidate only if their stinking party wins.
Consider for a moment that over 1/3 of those polled said they are voting for Hillary.
That is stunning to me.
Party loyalty?
First female POTUS?
“Clinton”?
Words fail me.
Low information voters hadn’t paid attention. They tuned in and found out Trump was was the right choice.
Wait til they see the Hillary Decline.
> “That’s what ***renowned*** statistician Nate Silver projected”
No Rush, you are quickly becoming the buffoon that Bill O’Reilly has become.
Silver is NOT a RENOWNED statistician. Statisticians that resort to politically polling are by and large flunkies to that profession.
Here is an example of a RENOWNED statistician:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming
Here’s another:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cox_(statistician)
And here’s another:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Breslow
Do not besmirch this noble profession of statistics with the likes of political polling flunkies.
Rush, if you must refer to Silver as something, refer to him as a pollster.
Because referring to Silver as a ‘renowned statistician’ is like referring to your delivery as Reaganesque. There is no, not one iota, of comparison.
Take a vacation Rush, your brain cells are dwindling.
> “That’s what ***renowned*** statistician Nate Silver projected”
No Rush, you are quickly becoming the buffoon that Bill O’Reilly has become.
Silver is NOT a RENOWNED statistician. Statisticians that resort to politically polling are by and large flunkies to that profession.
Here is an example of a RENOWNED statistician:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming
Here’s another:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cox_(statistician)
And here’s another:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Breslow
Do not besmirch this noble profession of statistics with the likes of political polling flunkies.
Rush, if you must refer to Silver as something, refer to him as a pollster.
Because referring to Silver as a ‘renowned statistician’ is like referring to your delivery as Reaganesque. There is no, not one iota, of comparison.
Take a vacation Rush, your brain cells are dwindling.
I don’t believe that the polls accurately reflect the insane voter intensity that exists in the Trump movement. His supporters have waited for 3, 4 and 5 hours in the bitter cold, excess heat and dripping wet humidity to see him live at rallies throughout the Nation. His crowds have been record breaking as was his primary vote total. The media has revealed their sick bias for people that hate our Country, hate Christians like Tim Tebow and hate all republicans unless they are RINOS like Lindsey Graham. The media has effectively influenced many independents to vote Trump. Far from destroying the Trump campaign, the media has hurt themselves and their fellow liberals.
That "bounce" is not going away and will GROW in the coming weeks.
I bet it is rattling Rush, Levin and the other sell outs as well.