Posted on 07/22/2016 5:47:03 AM PDT by Zakeet
We can't have President Trump, and she could do more to advance conservative ideas than he would.
With the theatrics and tumult of the Republican National Convention behind us, many Republicans remain steadfast in their opposition to Donald Trump to be president of the United States. The reason is simple: Their conscience says he does not reflect their principles, nor those of our Republican Party. Trumps isolationist approach, bombastic rhetoric and ignorance of issues are not things we can be proud to support. The president is the commander in chief, a role model for our children and Americas top ambassador to the world.
Republicans can either allow Trump to rebrand the GOP as unstable, xenophobic and crude, or they can regain control of their party. It may mean losing this election, but if they want a principled, rational agenda that reflects American values and promotes liberty, prosperity and security, there is no other choice: Writing in or staying home puts Republican control of the Senate at risk, and a libertarian protest vote could toss the election to Trump.
The last remaining option is an extreme option: Vote for Hillary Clinton.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
The libtards from the Washington Poo have some more good advice for you Freepers!
Hopefully, there are only 6 Republicans as stupid as George Will and Jeb Bush.
I just woke up- is this from the Onion?
Its almost a shame to use up the bandwidth with drivel like that Post article.
Not libtards....F-tards.
There’s a lot soiled underwear this morning!
Well there’s a sign of panic if I’ve ever seen one.
The irony is, the Dems might have had some success with this strategy if they had not nominated the most LOATHED, DETESTED, HATED and REVILED person currently breathing (aside from the current occupant of the White Hut)
By the logic of the scribbler of this dung, I await the column next week wherein Democrats are urged to vote for Trump.
Whatever John is smoking he should place it on the table and back away.
BWAHAHAHA
Is IBD articles banned? Hope so....they have turned VERY UGLY!
The scoop on the scribbler of this dung:
John Stubbs is a founder of R4C16.org, a group of Republicans for Clinton, and was senior advisor for U.S. Trade Representative in the Executive Office of the President from 2001-2007.
I think this author writes from his “hopey-Changey” place. Apparently there is still some residual Unicorn-fart-pixy dust out there.
Somebody should tell him to stop snorting it.
So the author’s bio indicates he worked in the US Trade Representatives office from 2001-07, and lists himself as an “International Affairs” consultant now. So his position isn’t surprising.
Interesting “would you rather”....
Jane Fonda or Hillary Clinton?
(Take your time book ending the premise)
“a role model for our children”
No, that’s cult speak. He’s simply a chief executive.
They thought we were that way anyways. Now they care about the GOP. The creativity they do to tell us how Trump is not what America needs or wants is admirable.
I can’t wait to hear her campaign screech.
Stockholm Syndrome?? If so, Barbara Bush is right there with him........as I suspect are also a lot of the Bushes.
We can't have President Trump, and she could do more to advance conservative ideas than he would.
Omg hahaha! Yes and she could shoot 40's out her vajayjay but that aint happening either. Such delusional F-s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.