Germany: Muslim Migrant Screaming 'Allah Akbar' Injures 21 with Axe-What did Angela Merkel expect?

What else did Angela Merkel expect?

July 19, 2016

The latest jihad attack in Germany reveals how difficult it is becoming for the political and media elites to maintain their fantasy-based narrative in the face of reality. An axe-wielding Muslim refugee from Afghanistan stormed a train, screamed “Allahu akbar” and began attacking passengers. This happened, of course, as a result of policies that Angela Merkel aggressively pursued. And as she did so, she must have known that this kind of thing would start happening. What else could she possibly have expected?

Those who called for Europe to take in as many Muslim migrants as possible may have foreseen this: after all, they insisted that the refugees were not a danger, but were in danger. Only racist bigoted Islamophobes would dare express any skepticism about the wisdom of admitting these refugees, we were told. To oppose the Muslim migrant influx into Europe was evidence of a moral defect, we were told.

And so, with 21 injured in this jihadi migrant’s axe attack, we will likely soon hear that he was mentally ill, traumatized by the war in his native Afghanistan, or enraged over some slight (or even over “Islamophobia”), and that the one thing we all must understand above everything else is that Islam had nothing, nothing whatsoever, to do with this attack, and that the one thing we must not do in the wake of this attack is question or resist the ongoing Muslim migrant influx. Everyone will say so. They always do.

But when they tell us this, they’re leaving out a few important details. Such as the fact that Ahmad al-Mohammed and one other of the jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered Europe as refugees.

In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. And the Lebanese Education Minister said in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in camps in his country. Meanwhile, 80% of migrants who have come to Europe claiming to be fleeing the war in Syria aren’t really from Syria at all.

So why are they claiming to be Syrian and streaming into Europe, and now the U.S. as well? An Islamic State operative gave the answer when he boasted in September 2015, shortly after the migrant influx began, that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 Islamic State jihadis had already entered Europe. He explained their purpose: “It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah.” These Muslims were going to Europe in the service of that caliphate: “They are going like refugees,” he said, but they were going with the plan of sowing blood and mayhem on European streets. As he told this to journalists, he smiled and said, “Just wait.”

On May 10, 2016, Patrick Calvar, the head of France’s DGSI internal intelligence agency, said that the Islamic State was using migrant routes through the Balkans to get jihadis into Europe.

Monday’s axe attack was just the beginning. Merkel has brought an untold number of jihad terrorists, and jihad terror sympathizers, to Germany, and more are coming all the time. The axe attack is a glimpse of Germany’s future, the future that Merkel has visited upon her nation – and the rest of the leaders of the Western world are eagerly following her lead.

The axe attack in Germany is, in microcosm, the future our children will face because our leaders are intent on being “multicultural” and avoiding “racism.” How long will Merkel and Obama continue to sacrifice their nations on the altars of these false idols? How much blood must be spilled before the leaders of the free world determine to defend their nations rather than let their people die in the service of shoring up multiculturalist fantasies?

It’s time to repudiate the political and media elites in both Europe and North America. We need some real leaders.

Merkel’s term ends in the fall of 2017....with a scheduled national election. No, she won’t be running again.

As for the German people? There are five political parties in the national government out of Berlin (plus 40 marginal ‘other’ parties existing in some form around the country). From those five political parties...all are hooked or hinged to the immigration vision set forward by Merkel. No one can get their attention or refocus on this issue because virtually all of the same political characters are handcuffed to Merkel.

So, there’s this sixth national party that is growing in terms of popularity....the AfD. And they are anti-immigration. Naturally, all five of the major parties dislike the AfD and lambaste them weekly. Public-wise, I’d guess polling would put them at 15-percent, and they might run up to 20-percent by the fall of 2017 and the big election.

I think there are three simple reasons for the patience or tolerance that you mention:

1. For a country of 81 million, the average refugee/immigration trend up until 2014, was roughly 250,000 a year. They had built their “door” to handle that, and with the exception of the Balkins period, that was the norm.

2. Population replacement isn’t going well. Private foundations, universities and the gov’t all admit that within 25 years...the 81 million population number will shrink to 65-to-68 million. This worries industry, the pension control folks, gov’t idiots, and just about everyone. They can’t fix this, so the logical trend is to accept immigration. Even I would agree...some immigration through a controlled door...is helpful. So they were hopeful.

3. The bulk of society in Germany bought off on excuses and the lame work of the state run news media for months, even when the anti-immigration crowd was trying to hype various issues. All went marginally well in the gov’t favor....until 31 Dec 2015, on New Year’s Eve in Koln. Then “something” hit the fan. With about a thousand women reporting sexual assault around Koln (lesser so in four other cites that night)...then the state-run news media delayed talking about this for about five days...that finished off the general patience of Germans.

Since mid-January....state elections and the big city-election episode across Germany, have demonstrated a trend for AfD (around 15-to-20 percent). They don’t have real money, and they’ve relied upon only five or six decent talking guys to really carry their message. In each state, they’ve got support now.

So we come to your question on Merkel and support now. If you ask about positive or negative feelings for Merkel herself....about 50-percent of the nation is positive, 10-percent neutral and 40-percent either mildly negative or very negative. As a leader, she has shown what you’d call the natural tendency of a professor in a lab experiment....”let’s not rush into doing something hasty”-attitude.

She hasn’t made a bunch of stupid mistakes and had any corruption at all. She hasn’t had to fire anyone because she vets folks and demands accountability.

Up until this past three years....she was considered an outstanding Chancellor (probably second best since WW II ended).

Polling for the six political parties and the fall 2017 election trend: (roughly)

CDU (right-center party, Merkel’s party): 32 percent
SPD (left-center party): 20 percent
Linke Party (former Communist Party of DDR): 9 percent
Green Party: 14 percent
FDP (anti-taxation, responsible spending party): 5 percent
AfD (anti-immigration, etc): 15 percent

The rest are split among 40 marginal parties.

Note within this....as AfD grows, they take votes from the CDU, the SPD, and the Linke Party (strangely enough). Last month, the neo-Nazi Party in one eastern state were standing down now and telling their people to vote only for the AfD.

Here’s the two curious things. (1) The center-right and center-left parties have always had 65-percent to 85 percent of the national vote between them since 1949. If you add up the numbers now...they will barely get to 50-percent. That worries alot of people....the public isn’t voting center-left-right anymore. (2) To lead a gov’t, as the winner in the election, you have to have 50-percent of the vote or form a coalition with one or two partners. With the AfD there, no one will form partners with them, but this is forcing for strange politics when the right-leaning party (CDU) has to partner with the SPD and maybe even the Green Party, to lead the government.

Next big episodes? Two state elections in Sep and Oct. Then you have three state elections in Apr and May of next year. These will all show trends. Merkel is bowing out but it’s questionable what kind of government leads Germany after that fall 2017 election.

Remember....Nov 1932....the Nazi Party only needed 37-percent to win, and after that....nothing worked well again.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.