Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Definitive Ranking of Who Trump Should Have Picked for VP
The Weekly Standard ^ | 7/14/2016 | Jonathon Last

Posted on 07/14/2016 7:45:34 PM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: iowamark; fieldmarshaldj; Impy

So Jonathon Last says Pence would be the “worst” choice for veep and egomaniac/backstabbing has been Newt would be the “best”, with Chris Christie as the “second best”, and then Trump picking his own daughter as veep in the top 4 choices.

I guess he was writing an article for The Onion, and accidentally published it in The Weekly Standard.


21 posted on 07/14/2016 8:18:14 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

22 posted on 07/14/2016 8:22:12 PM PDT by Bobalu (Democrats use guns to shoot the innocent. Republicans use them for self-defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Jonathan’s last brain cell must have died the last time he huffed paint.


23 posted on 07/14/2016 8:23:34 PM PDT by Impy (Never Shillery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Chuck Norris’s dog is a Velociraptor.


24 posted on 07/14/2016 8:24:52 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Are YOU?


25 posted on 07/14/2016 8:27:45 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

Trump has been my #1 pick since the day he announced he was running...

Are YOU?


26 posted on 07/14/2016 8:32:15 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Of course, and it will count if Oregon flips.


27 posted on 07/14/2016 8:40:30 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Pence is open borders
pro-TPP
anti-muslim ban

What the hell are his good points? Nice Hair?


28 posted on 07/14/2016 8:59:50 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Weakly Standard trying to “help” out Trump.


29 posted on 07/14/2016 9:07:51 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
this article is ludicrous
30 posted on 07/14/2016 9:10:04 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ri4dc

West is my first choice too.


31 posted on 07/14/2016 10:43:19 PM PDT by Prince of Space (Be Breitbart, baby. LIFB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Two words:

Bobby Jindal

red


32 posted on 07/14/2016 11:14:30 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Mr.Last’s picks are not only stupid and uneducated, but laughable in the extreme.


33 posted on 07/14/2016 11:16:23 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

Jindal is NOT a NBC; he is an anchor baby.


34 posted on 07/14/2016 11:18:39 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Intraparty harmony, a wonder to behold.


35 posted on 07/15/2016 1:12:58 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Jeb for President Vice President Secretary of State anything....
36 posted on 07/15/2016 2:05:26 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Lots of the same pundits, who said he’d never make it as the nominee are now trying to show how smart their advice is - comical if not so pathetic.


37 posted on 07/15/2016 4:02:01 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

You are getting way too much information that is not correct. The anchor baby definition most used, and one that the information you have is using, is when a pregnant woman from a family, and or spouse, uses the American soil baby born to establish a foothold to stay in the US. This was not the case. The Jindals went through the process of immigration prior to entering the US. They received, prior to entry, visas consistent with their positions. Once they secured immigrant visas and became lawful permanent residents, they could seek citizenship on their own after five years of residence and meeting other requirements,”
At the time of their arrival, his mother had a scholarship to study nuclear physics at Louisiana State University, and his father, an engineer professor, was working for a subsidiary of the Kansas City Southern Railway. A couple of years later, Amar Jindal took a new job with the Exxon oil company. Jindal’s mother Raj Gupta earned two master’s degrees, one in physics and another in nuclear engineering. She ultimately worked for the state Labor Department in information technology.
They came in legal, with the proper clearance from the US government, and Bob Jindal’s birth had nothing to do with it.

Oh, and because he was born on American soil, he is a naturalized born citizen.

red


38 posted on 07/15/2016 8:40:59 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71
Your last sentence is correct; the rest is just silly, as I never claimed that he was an ILLEGAL "anchor baby".

Jindal, Rubio, and Nikki Haley aren't NBCers and many of us have been calling those three "anchor babies" for a year. It's FR SLANG/SHORTHAND for everything you wrote.

39 posted on 07/15/2016 2:01:29 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Then I guess I’m unable to determine what your idea is of an anchor baby. I was raised in California and we saw many anchor babies birthed on American soil for the purpose of securing a foothold toward citizenship by the parents who were here illegally. That’s how the term got started many years before it was made a public word. There is no such thing as a legal anchor baby. The only use of the word is to represent a loophole in the border laws to sneak family into the country that did not go through the proper process of immigration. What I displayed for you was what happened and not once did I leave the facts short. Jindal’s parents were here legally so Bobby Jindal cannot be called an anchor baby. Just the first generation of the Jindal family born in the US.

red


40 posted on 07/15/2016 4:42:15 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson