Posted on 07/13/2016 3:13:37 AM PDT by Liz
Another cankley bitch.
Makes too much sense to those sucking off the backs of taxpayers.....on the govt payroll.
It ain't only their mentors and it ain't only Democratsd.
As Lou Dobbs said Sam Giancana was more forthcoming than she was yesterday
Lynch probably secured 50k from Bill for abiding.
You know anyone the commie’s elect are going to be corrupt.
Add another zero or two.I don’t think that the Blue Blimpy would work for pocket change.
2.5 million.
The Slick and the Sleazy Handmaidens of Obama
Real photo. Those criminal degenerates are really sucking it in at the taxpayers’ trough. Liar. Criminal. Fatso.
The follow-up should have been: If Hillary was allowed to disclose classified data to others not holding security clearances, including her own attorneys and otheraids outside the State Department, are there documents that Hillary's people were shown that the Committee is not allowed to see? Can the committee see those same documents, un-redacted, as Hillary showed them to others? Since there was no criminal intent on Hillary's part (according to Comey), and criminal intent is required (according to Comey), what criminal intent would be necessary to show the oversight Committee the same documents? Why can't the committee see everything? What if Hillary gave those documents to the Committee - would that simply be careless or would it be criminal?
She’s in contempt of Congress, jail her.
They can not, they are compromised. What do you think the dems have used the NSA data for? Some of the idiots have even told the public how they are using it.
Term limits is the only answer for the corruption that happens to politicians in Washington and that is not going to happen.
Lynch dodged, bobbed, and weaved on a simple question:
Is it illegal to hand off classified materials to someone who does not hold a security clearance?
Congress' follow-up should have been:
<><>Hillary was allowed to disclose classified data to others not holding security clearances, including her own attorneys and otheraids outside the State Department,
<><> are there documents that Hillary's people were shown that the Committee is not allowed to see?
<><> Can the Congressional committee see those same documents, un-redacted, as Hillary showed them to others?
<><> Since there was no criminal intent on Hillary's part (according to Comey), and criminal intent is required (according to Comey), what criminal intent would be necessary to show the oversight Committee the same documents?
<><> Why can't the committee see everything?
<><> What if Hillary gave those documents to the Committee - would that simply be careless or would it be criminal?
<><> would Comey give Congress a pass?
Lynch dodged, bobbed, and weaved on a simple question:
Is it illegal to hand off classified materials to someone who does not hold a security clearance?
Congress' follow-up should have been:
<><>Hillary was allowed to disclose classified data to others not holding security clearances, including her own attorneys and otheraids outside the State Department,
<><> are there documents that Hillary's people were shown that the Committee is not allowed to see?
<><> Can the Congressional committee see those same documents, un-redacted, as Hillary showed them to others?
<><> Since there was no criminal intent on Hillary's part (according to Comey), and criminal intent is required (according to Comey), what criminal intent would be necessary to show the oversight Committee the same documents?
<><> Why can't the committee see everything?
<><> What if Hillary gave those documents to the Committee - would that simply be careless or would it be criminal?
<><> would Comey give Congress a pass?
“He only chose her b/c she has a vagina.......somewhere.”
___
Like hitlery, a vagina is wasted on her.
AG Lynch dodged, bobbed, and weaved on a simple question:
Is it illegal to hand off classified materials to someone who does not hold a security clearance?
Demand Congress follow-up using these questions (hat tip SERKIT):
<><>Hillary was allowed to disclose classified data to others not holding security clearances, including her own attorneys and otheraids outside the State Department,
<><> are there documents that Hillary's people were shown that the Committee is not allowed to see?
<><> Can the Congressional committee see those same documents, un-redacted, as Hillary showed them to others?
<><> Since there was no criminal intent on Hillary's part (according to Comey), and criminal intent is required (according to Comey), what criminal intent would be necessary to show the oversight Committee the same documents?
<><> Why can't the committee see everything?
<><> What if Hillary gave those documents to the Committee - would that simply be careless or would it be criminal?
<><> would Comey give Congress a pass? (hat tip SERKIT)
Lynch needs to be removed. She controls the AG and she is “friends” with the Clintons or at minimum trying who would be her future boss. Tell me there’s not a conflict of interest here. At minimum she needs to be disbarred for this gaffe.
Probably VERY true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.