Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chiller

Open Carry is ‘In Your Face’. While the carriers feel that this is their right I believe it brings things to a head and alienates more that it helps. As far as safety and security it reduces the carrier’s options. I am certain to arouse the ire of many Open Carry people. I am a retired federal officer, 35 years and a staunch 2 Amendment supporter but I believe discretion is needed. Especially in a situation such as occurred in Dallas. Carrying openly during protests is just asking for trouble. Let’s protect our Amendment Rights by using common sense.


7 posted on 07/10/2016 9:58:02 PM PDT by dvan (Send Them Home!Napolatono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: dvan

I’ve long believed open carry is for making a political statement and concealed carry is for defense. Now, there is probably some tipping point, where enough routine open carry becomes a real deterrent to crime. Not sure how often a criminal would have to see armed people around to decide to leave and not simply come back some other time.


8 posted on 07/10/2016 10:02:00 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: dvan
I agree. In the Dallas riots last week, with open carry, how are the cops supposed to know who the bad/good guys are?

I prefer concealed carry, but have open carried occasionally to observe peoples' reactions here in Western North Carolina.

11 posted on 07/10/2016 10:14:02 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: dvan

Open Carry is ‘In Your Face’. While the carriers feel that this is their right I believe it brings things to a head and alienates more that it helps. As far as safety and security it reduces the carrier’s options. I am certain to arouse the ire of many Open Carry people. I am a retired federal officer, 35 years and a staunch 2 Amendment supporter but I believe discretion is needed. Especially in a situation such as occurred in Dallas. Carrying openly during protests is just asking for trouble. Let’s protect our Amendment Rights by using common sense.
__________________________________________
I couldn’t disagree with you more. Stop and analyze. Why did the shooter go alone to the rooftop? Do you think he would have preferred to to be a crowd of armed citizens? Ears can quickly tell you where the rounds are coming from. Additionally, I am sure with the location of the victims, it was easy to determine the shooter was not at ground level in the crowd. If the crowd was not armed, he would have likely been in the gun free zone and indiscriminately sweeping both police and protestors. It’s a proven fact, armed citizens are always a deterrent, not an encouragement to such acts.


20 posted on 07/11/2016 2:00:55 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: dvan
As far as safety and security it reduces the carrier’s options.

Read Texas laws before spouting off. We have the option on sidearms, open or concealed.

Long guns have been legal to carry open for as long as I have been alive (59) and are not covered by the same laws as sidearms.

35 years does not make you an expert only gives you experience. Use it wisely.

#TEXIT

25 posted on 07/11/2016 4:11:14 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson