I was half listening, but I thought I heard someone question Comey about whether non-compliance with FOIA was tied in with the investigation and he either said no or declined to answer. Anyone clarify that because it is pertinent if there might be ongoing investigations which many suspect?
Comey has been grossy inadequate on the whole “intent” issue with Hillary.
Even if he were right that she should not be prosecuted without the “intent” checkbox checked, he gives no evidence that he pursued Hillary’s motives to (1) hide from FOIA legal requirements, (2) hide from State Dept. document archiving legal requirements, and (3) hide all of the Clinton Foundation communications with and within State Dept staff.
There are all kinds of red flags about Hillary’s “intent” in setting up a private server system to hide tens of thousands of documents from legal scrutiny and oversight.
Also, IF there is anything nefarious going on with Clinton Foundation and pay-to-play etc. (which seems so obvious) then obviously Hillary has immense “intent” to hide criminal activities intertwined with classified communications.
Comey and co. have botched this in so many ways, no matter how many times he boasts of the quality of their investigation.
Gowdy was the one who gave Comey several instances of her sworn testimony which Comey clearly noted was contradicted by the FBI’s findings. There better be a referral to the FBI for criminal investigation for perjury as was promised by the chairman.