Maybe and maybe not.
Depends on who is on the committee and what questions are asked.
At the high end are direct questions that demand that he quote title, section, page and paragraph of his opening statements. Intentions will never enter into the questioning. Potentially an i8mmediate open public trial of Clinton’s activities with minimal political cover.
At the low end is your nothing burger.
BTW - some of the committee members may be out for Clinton’s blood to curry favor with DJT after January 2017.
Yes, pass the pop corn, get out the extra large super sugary drinks and barf bags. You may end up using all three starting tomorrow.
The Republicans’ performance on most committee hearings does little to inspire confidence.
There is one particular question that they should ask (but probably won’t): Were any of the Secretary’s emails sent to the president or any of his top aids? His response to, and the implications of, that question could be very revealing.
Begs the question, where have these mystery people been for decades of this deceit and corruption? Why have they not said anything? Why would they say or do anything now?