No clear evidence they intended to violate laws.
They were extremely careless.
So, if I rob a bank but didn’t know it violated the law, I can go free?
I’m having a hard time “reading” his position so far. Talking of hacking now, though.
Will be interesting to see his end game
He goes back and forth between guilty and not guilty
“No clear evidence they intended to violate laws.”
But isn’t simply having and using the private server “intent?” Why else would she have it?