Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jurroppi1
The simplest way to look at it is to see how the IRS treats different aspects of "compensation." The basic rule is that real "compensation" must be reported to the IRS as taxable income on the employee's W-2 form (by the employer) and tax returns (by the employee).

Payroll taxes are just that: taxes. They are reported that way on your W-2 form.

If your employer pays the premium on a life insurance policy and you or your next of kin (not the employer) is listed as the beneficiary, then the premium is reported as taxable income on your W-2 form.

The key here is that real compensation only counts if the benefit accrues now, not at some unspecified point in the future when SSI may not even be solvent.

120 posted on 07/04/2016 6:30:15 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The salient point in this discussion is that they are real costs to the employer, which is really what the conversation should be about here. Just because compensation was focused on (incorrectly in my opinion) doesn’t mean that total compensation and benefits/liabilities on the employer’s side should be ignored.

If employer’s keep echoing their real costs correctly, it is then, and only then that people on a broader scale will realize that it isn’t all rainbows and unicorns being an employer.


126 posted on 07/04/2016 2:58:07 PM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson