Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Disastrous Court Decision on Abortion
Townhall.com ^ | June 29, 2016 | Star Parker

Posted on 06/29/2016 5:19:39 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Ingtar

No kidding. Next time OSHA shows up I’ll tell them we have had virtually no deaths and see how that works out.


21 posted on 06/29/2016 7:00:07 AM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Women have the right to kill an unborn child.


22 posted on 06/29/2016 7:22:42 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Want to end abortion? get congress to outlaw it, until then the court will continue to uphold the law they created out of thin air.

And the Supreme Eagles will then declare the law unconstitutional, particularly when the Chief Executive refuses to enforce the law by ignoring it. /s

23 posted on 06/29/2016 7:43:28 AM PDT by imardmd1 (If you're not at the table you'll be on the menu . . . count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
The extremists won't stop going back to courts to try to expand their agenda. If republicans maintain control of both houses of Congress after November, the new representatives need to take a firm stand regarding court activision. At every level, activist judges must be impeached - several dozen at least. The Supreme Court should shed several members by the same method. I know the democrat spokesmen in the press will scream about high crimes, but the HoR is singularly tasked with determining what constitutes an impeachable high crime or a suitable misdemeanor.

Until the courts are returned to the control of the House, their relentless implementation of extremism will not abate.

24 posted on 06/29/2016 8:00:59 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

TX AG ought to enforce the laws anyway. Duly passed laws are the will of the people.

It is not as if TX is banning the non-codified scotus declared “right to kill unborn babies” or anything.


25 posted on 06/29/2016 8:37:58 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dacula

OK so all those who abstained in 2008.
Stop splitting hair and get with the main point.
Are you planning to abstain in 2016?


26 posted on 06/29/2016 9:59:53 AM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote, you are actually voting for the candidate's rich donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Even though Romney was dead last on my preference list throughout 2012 (Herman Cain was 1st) , I am willing to give Romney benefit of doubt, that his nominations to replace Scalia & impending 1 to 3 vacancies coming up would not be as anywhere near as bad as what Hillary will nominate.


27 posted on 06/29/2016 10:03:41 AM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote, you are actually voting for the candidate's rich donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson