Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bushwon; Windflier; Sacajaweau; EDINVA; tumblindice

Many thanks for the info on when they used the phrase “presumptive nominee”.

They did it in April 2012, before mittens had enough delegates.

Have they -ever- used that term -after- a candidate had enough delegates ?

In June, after all the primaries were done?

That’s what I was wondering .


217 posted on 06/27/2016 5:19:29 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57
It's found in many, many articles and also in earlier races. And just because someone introduces a new word into a dialogue doesn't change the FACT....the Nomination occurs at the convention after the votes have been cast and a nominee is finally chosen.

Presumptive, probable, most likely...use any of those words or any others that mean the same thing.

The point is....there is no ACTUAL nominee until the votes have been cast and the nominee emerges.

This whole conversation is a dumb rut.

218 posted on 06/27/2016 5:25:09 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (YS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57

https://newrepublic.com/article/133223/makes-presidential-nominee-presumptive


220 posted on 06/27/2016 5:35:21 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (YS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson