Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "That Secession business couldn't be tolerated because it was about to interrupt the money flow."

I can grant you this much: a number of posters have found reports where some Northern newspapers expressed such concerns.
But none called for war to redress the concern.

Just as today, economic concerns are a major focus of politics, and the Chinese or Mexicans are blamed for "stealing our jobs".
Actually, our own leaders are blamed for negotiating such bad deals.
But regardless of these heart-felt concerns, nobody suggests we go to war against anybody to bring our jobs back.

So in early 1861.
Economic concerns are one thing, war is something else entirely.

733 posted on 07/20/2016 8:21:21 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; BroJoeK
Brojoker said this to you: “... some Northern newspapers expressed such concerns.

“But none called for war to redress the concern.”

He must have missed this one.

3/22/1861 The economic editor of the New York Times said,
“At once shut down every Southern port, destroy its commerce, and bring utter ruin on the Confederate States.”d

Sounds like calling for war to me. How about you?

735 posted on 07/21/2016 8:47:08 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson