Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

Your point on that video? That cargo plane was on take off, hence the extreme climb, then lost its engines, and could not continue its take off acceleration.

...

That 747 was carrying cargo and had a cargo shift to the rear. It continued to fly afterward for a short time. That’s my point. You specifically said a plane can’t fly unbalanced at all regardless of momentum, and that’s false.

That’s my point.


147 posted on 06/23/2016 12:15:41 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
That 747 was carrying cargo and had a cargo shift to the rear. It continued to fly afterward for a short time. That’s my point. You specifically said a plane can’t fly unbalanced at all regardless of momentum, and that’s false.

How much cargo shifted? Did that fully functional and not-noseless 747 climb 3800 feet before stalling and falling out of the sky? No? Why not?

165 posted on 06/23/2016 5:25:40 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
You specifically said a plane can’t fly unbalanced at all regardless of momentum

I don't think that what we saw in that VIDEO was a plane FLYING.

203 posted on 06/23/2016 9:28:40 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson