And each of those have a zoom climb in them that the MATH does not allow. Not at all. Where does the energy come from when Boeing says uncategorically that the engines at loss of signal from the flight deck WILL GO TO IDLE! How hard is that to grasp? There was no altitude data from the passive radar returns after the initiating event yet you have the CIA claiming the aircraft GAINED altitude to 16,000 feet, at least in this graph, and the NTSB claiming 1200. There is no way either of these graphs is possible when the plane went into a stall condition almost instantly with the center of gravity 12 feet behind the center of lift. Planes cannot fly unless they are balanced. The plane was unbalanced. . . And the engines were not providing any energy to the system to add to the lift. This chart is bogus because they did not include the math to back up any of graphed lines! They just drew them and claimed they matched radar that had ZERO altitude data. That was why people, including aeronautical engineers and expert crash investigators, were filing FOI lawsuits for that data and calculations which were stonewalled! Boeing itself said they were NOT included in the making of those videos and graphs!
There is no way either of these graphs is possible when the plane went into a stall condition almost instantly with the center of gravity 12 feet behind the center of lift. Planes cannot fly unless they are balanced. The plane was unbalanced. . .
...
Planes sure can fly unbalanced, especially if they have momentum. If the condition is extreme they will stop flying at some point, as TWA800 did.
Here’s another example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sUWC2jfjqI