Who gets to Scarborough? He was TRUMP’s fairest platform from the day TRUMP announced. Morning Joe kicked FOXMegyn News Corp to the curb in the wee hours of morning for months and months with political meat and no giggles coverage.
Hillary finally tops out, gains the Democratic nomination and then BOOM, Scarborough freaksz(!) over every TRUMP word or deed, or tiniest controversy, burying TRUMP in doom and gloom in Scarborough’s trademark authoritarian and arrogant manner.
Now, it’s Joe (for three solid hours a day) driving the oncoming train for the opposition, of blood and guts hatred toward the man TRUMP, pushing the GOP and mocking them for not openly abandoning the biggest Republican vote getter in history, to capture the party nomination.
They are all right out of the DNC mafia now. I had to quit recording his program as soon as Hillary came up with the nomination.
TRUMP must have really dissed Joe’ or his job was threatened. DJT takes nothing lying down, we know that, or else Joe was so fair to TRUMP, for so long, that he got tired of the heat he was taking from the Left and the MNBC bosses. What would Joe do without this job. He is pretty cocked sure he is God’s singular gift to American politics that’s for sure.
Scarborough is part of the Globalist Elitist problem.
Experts Announce That Reagan Can’t Win An Election
The usual suspects predicting doom and gloom.
Seriously. Go the the link below, one year and a day ago of all of us opining about Trump's prospects including myself. Man how right some were, but note, how wrong most of us were.
When was the last time Scarborough was right?
Goldwater had to deal with the liberal media on ALL THREE stations.
If LBJ had left 4 people to die in Benghazi, ‘lost’ $6Billion in the state department, had Vince Foster killed, made $100K in cattle futures, married a rapist, etc etc etc no one would know about any of that.
Scarborough greatly over estimates the power of political correctness.
I wonder if that thought hit him before or after the wet dream....
hillary’s life depends on a Trump win
msnbc seems to be the definition of reservation etc. etc.
They must of sent the cast to reeducation camp.
The sad part is msnbc is popular in DC.
To me, Joe Scarborough has the accumulative insight and steep political acumen whose status is on par with, and holds the the esteem of, a junior college fraternity president.
Oh, and Mika? Tell us again for the millionth time who your daddy is as you check your hair in the floor studio monitor. Gag.
Special Report
How Carter Beat Reagan
Washington Post admits polling was “in-kind contribution”; New York Times agenda polling.
By Jeffrey Lord – 9.25.12
Dick Morris is right.
Here’s something Dick Morris doesn’t mention. And he’s charitable.
Remember when Jimmy Carter beat Ronald Reagan in 1980?
That’s right. Jimmy Carter beat Ronald Reagan in 1980.
In a series of nine stories in 1980 on “Crucial States” — battleground states as they are known today — the New York Times repeatedly told readers then-President Carter was in a close and decidedly winnable race with the former California governor. And used polling data from the New York Times/CBS polls to back up its stories.
Four years later, it was the Washington Post that played the polling game — and when called out by Reagan campaign manager Ed Rollins a famous Post executive called his paper’s polling an “in-kind contribution to the Mondale campaign.” Mondale, of course, being then-President Reagan’s 1984 opponent and Carter’s vice president.
All of which will doubtless serve as a reminder of just how blatantly polling data is manipulated by liberal media — used essentially as a political weapon to support the liberal of the moment, whether Jimmy Carter in 1980, Walter Mondale in 1984 — or Barack Obama in 2012.
First the Times in 1980 and how it played the polling game.
The states involved, and the datelines for the stories:
· California — October 6, 1980
· Texas — October 8, 1980
· Pennsylvania — October 10, 1980
· Illinois — October 13, 1980
· Ohio — October 15, 1980
· New Jersey — October 16, 1980
· Florida — October 19, 1980
· New York — October 21, 1980
· Michigan — October 23, 1980
Of these nine only one was depicted as “likely” for Reagan: Reagan’s own California. A second — New Jersey — was presented as a state that “appears to support” Reagan.
The Times led their readers to believe that each of the remaining seven states were “close” — or the Times had Carter leading outright.
In every single case the Times was proven grossly wrong on election day. Reagan in fact carried every one of the nine states.
Here is how the Times played the game with the seven of the nine states in question.
• Texas: In a story datelined October 8 from Houston, the Times headlined:
Texas Looming as a Close Battle Between President and Reagan
The Reagan-Carter race in Texas, the paper claimed, had “suddenly tightened and now shapes up as a close, bruising battle to the finish.” The paper said “a New York Times/CBS News Poll, the second of seven in crucial big states, showing the Reagan-Carter race now a virtual dead heat despite a string of earlier polls on both sides that had shown the state leaning toward Mr. Reagan.”
The narrative? It was like the famous scene in the Wizard of Oz where Dorothy and her friends stare in astonishment as dog Toto pulls back the curtain in the wizard’s lair to reveal merely a man bellowing through a microphone. Causing the startled “wizard” caught in the act to frantically start yelling, “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!” In the case of the Times in its look at Texas in October of 1980 the paper dismissed “a string of earlier polls on both sides” that repeatedly showed Texas going for Reagan. Instead, the Times presented this data:
A survey of 1,050 registered voters, weighted to form a probable electorate, gave Mr. Carter 40 percent support, Mr. Reagan 39 percent, John. B. Anderson, the independent candidate, 3 percent, and 18 percent were undecided. The survey, conducted by telephone from Oct. 1 to Oct. 6, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
In other words, the race in Texas is close, assures the Times, with Carter actually in the lead.
What happened? Reagan beat Carter by over 13 points. It wasn’t even close to close.
http://spectator.org/articles/34732/how-carter-beat-reagan
FReepers need to learn to ignore polls.
Most of us hang up on pollsters but, if you ever do participate in a poll and listen to the questioning you can almost always recognize the narrative they are trying to produce and then you hang up.
He’s gone full Baghdad Bob.
Well since your wing of the party caused Trump by your duplicity, treachery and fecklessness if that happens I will blame you! dumb butt!!
Scarborough is sucking up for the potential role as The Beast’s Presidential press secretary.
The Left truly does not know what to say — or do — about Donald Trump. They are truly flummoxed.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." ‑‑ Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
"I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won't last out the year." ‑‑ The editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall, 1957
"But what ... is it good for?" ‑‑ Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.
"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." ‑‑ Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977
"640K ought to be enough for anybody." ‑‑ Bill Gates, 1981
"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." ‑‑ Western Union internal memo, 1876.
"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular? ‑‑ David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s.
"The concept is interesting and well‑formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible." ‑‑ A Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith's paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service. (Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.)
"Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" ‑‑ H.M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927.
"I'm just glad it'll be Clark Gable who's falling on his face and not Gary Cooper." ‑‑ Gary Cooper on his decision not to take the leading role in "Gone With The Wind."
"A cookie store is a bad idea. Besides, the market research reports say America likes crispy cookies, not soft and chewy cookies like you make." ‑‑ Response to Debbi Fields' idea of starting Mrs. Fields' Cookies.
"We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out." ‑‑ Decca Recording Co. rejecting the Beatles, 1962.
"Heavier‑than‑air flying machines are impossible." ‑‑ Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.
"If I had thought about it, I wouldn't have done the experiment. The literature was full of examples that said you can't do this." ‑‑ Spencer Silver on the work that led to the unique adhesives for 3‑M "Post‑It" Notepads.
"So we went to Atari and said, 'Hey, we've got this amazing thing, even built with some of your parts, and what do you think about funding us? Or we' ll give it to you. We just want to do it. Pay our salary, we'll come work for you.' And they said, 'No.' So then we went to Hewlett‑Packard, and they said, 'Hey, we don't need you. You haven't got through college yet.'" ‑‑ Apple Computer Inc. founder Steve Jobs on attempts to get Atari and H‑P interested in his and Steve Wozniak's personal computer. [Ed note: To say their computer is not quite correct, it was designed by Wozniak's entirely.]
"Professor Goddard does not know the relation between action and reaction and the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react. He seems to lack the basic knowledge ladled out daily in high schools." ‑‑ 1921 New York Times editorial about Robert Goddard's revolutionary rocket work.
"You want to have consistent and uniform muscle development across all of your muscles? It can't be done. It's just a fact of life. You just have to accept inconsistent muscle development as an unalterable condition of weight training." ‑‑ Response to Arthur Jones, who solved the "unsolveable" problem by inventing Nautilus.
"Drill for oil? You mean drill into the ground to try and find oil? You're crazy." ‑‑ Drillers who Edwin L. Drake tried to enlist to his project to drill for oil in 1859.
