Of course. The book “Clinton Cash” outlines some of it.
The plot thickens.
“In what may be the pinnacle of hypocrisy, moments ago Hillary Clinton, while speaking live on national security and addressing the Orlando shooting took some time from her constant bashing of the Second Amendment and calling for a ban on assault rifles, to say some less than kind words about Saudi Arabia whom it accused of supporting radical organizations. This is what she said:
The third area that demands attention is preventing radicalization and countering efforts by ISIS and other international terrorist networks to recruit in the United States and Europe. For starters, it is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations. And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path towards extremism. We also have to use all our capabilities to counter jihadist propaganda online. This is something that I spend a lot of time on at the State Department.
There is nothing wrong with that statement, as it is the whole truth - Saudi Arabia’s involvement in supporting terrorism stretches from Sept 11 all the way through to ISIS - however, where there is a big, and potentially law-breaking, problem is what Jordan’s official news agency, Petra News Agency, reported on Sunday citing the Saudi crown price, namely that Saudi Arabia is a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next president of the United States.”
Like Trump said, “Clinton was operating the State Dept., like it was her own private hedge fund”.
She is corrupt like Obama and .....Billy
PING!!
Article and comments
Clinton is corrupt. She should be in prison.>>>>>>>>>>>
Cha-ching.....you can hear the sound of push poll cash registers as Hillolita spends all that Arab and Chinese money on her push polls which allege she is up 20 points over Trump.
Hillary is indeed a criminal. She needs to be arrested, tried and sentenced.
:: not identified in the document, entitled “Exhibit A.” ::
Just, exactly, who identified it as Exhibit A? DailyCaller, a court entity, Trump.
This appears as a way to add some legalese-cache to documents that may/may-not have been manufactured.
My point...Dan Rather.