Skip to comments.Wikileaks will publish ‘enough evidence’ to indict Hillary Clinton, warns Assange
Posted on 06/13/2016 2:35:56 PM PDT by Lorianne
Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange warns more information will be published about Hillary Clinton, enough to indict her if the US government is courageous enough to do so, in what he predicts will be a very big year for the whistleblowing website.
We have emails relating to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication, Assange told Peston on Sunday when asked if more of her leaked electronic communications would be published.
About 32,000 emails from her private server have been leaked by Wikileaks so far, but Assange would not confirm the number of emails or when they are expected to be published.
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
Yes. Bring it.
The enemy of my enemy....
I’m always skeptical of Big Promises to Release Big Data.
What’s stopping you from just releasing it now, instead of promising to release it soon/later/shortly/this-year?
Go man go!
Wikileaks can’t indict anyone.
A release in October seems about right.
Sounds like a shakedown
He’ll be dead within the month, another mysterious coincidental Arkancide.
Waiting for a donation from the Clinton Global Initiative ...
note the source: RT.....
right up there with Debkka
Well, the strategy is nuanced. I don’t like big news brags about pending releases of controversially data. We’ve seen to many of these bait and switch schemes from talk radio — particularly Glen Beck.
Yet, with Assange — we know he can have the goods, the DOJ and the State Department knows he can have the goods. I would suspect that first sending the emails in question to the DOJ or State department first, might force them to release the emails (and thus instant credibility) in order to get ahead of the bad news.
I’ve had no use for Assange before now but if he brings Shrillary down I will applaud him for that!
This is blackmail negotiations.
Good news, but she will still face no charges.
In fact they could have 1,000x more stuff on here and the effect would be the same:
1. Obama took out a long-term rent in the DC area
2. He has been SUPER clear about staying in politics
3. He has all this stuff on her —much more than her 500 FBI files on Congressmen
She would not be Bill’s “Third Term”, she will be OBAMA’S third term.
So he’s going to hold all this stuff over her head, and it’s only valuable if the axe doesn’t fall.
From her perspective she MUST win —I expect Obama would use all that stuff on her if she doesn’t rise to the Presidency.
Is Debka disreputable?
Hey Wikileaks, can we have a few dozen teaser pages to whet our appetites? You know, to prove that you actually have something and aren’t just blowing smoke up our ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.