Posted on 06/13/2016 10:55:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
This has nothing to do with homosexuals as mohammedans have no problem with it as long as they are the ones getting their jollies.
This is what mohammedans believe about sex.
Sex that includes a male mohammedan being dominate and enjoying himself is right. This includes sex with infants, children, women, castrated men, animals and rocks. Any sex where anyone else gets pleasure is wrong.
Yes.
The fix was already in when we left the oil fields intact for them to use decades ago.
The establishment care far more for their unholy alliance with the House of Saud, et al, than they care about the United States of America and We the People.
Bttt.
5.56mm
This is critical thinking. The WH has only became angered when the US funded terrorist attacked a homosexual establishment and killed so many. And the WH response is to lower the flag and bathe the WH in rainbow colors. Yes it seems the only groups that matter to the democrats are the gays and the Islamic extremists. Both were involved and their first response was to blame the nra, the top and any breathing conservative. This war is a war within the Democratic Party, one faction killing another faction over control. There is a part of me that says to stand back and let them kill each other but that is not the responsible thing to do. We can’t go after radical Islam, or the democrats will call us names, and we can’t say anything about the gays because the democrats will call us names. So what to do?
NO. IF YOU BLOW UP EVERY MOSLUM CITY, the moslums who survive will decide they want to live with a 21st century mindset instead of dying with a 7th century one. History proves .......
YOU DON’T HAVE TO KILL THEM ALL, YOU JUST HAVE TO KILL ENOUGH TO CONVINCE THE REST.!!!
It’s a clear choice. The LW has put Islam in a protected class,clean while Islam wants to kill al other protected classes. While the LW is focused on a couple of baptists and Catholics that are prolife or pro straight, Islam is gaining power and clout and may soon be the dominate force in the us, and that marks the end of minorities, protected classes and civil rights. Either the lLW gets on board to fight the Common enemy, or they help Islam take away the rights
Bring yer kids!!!
You’ve just identified at least half the problem- Americans are wussified/pussified/paralyzed, at the mere thought of being called names. SO WHAT! Man up! Fight back! ATTACK! ATTACK! ATTACK!
CHOICE killed almost 3,300 future American citizens on 9/11.
CHOICE killed almost 3,300 future American citizens on 9/11.
CHOICE killed almost 3,300 future American citizens on 9/12.
CHOICE killed almost 3,300 future American citizens on 9/13.
CHOICE killed almost 3,300 future American citizens on 9/14.
CHOICE killed almost 3,300 future American citizens on 9/15.
While homosexuality is wrong and disgusting, but some evil muslim killing 49 and wounding 53 Americans is evil
“A war against an idea isn’t going to go far.”
Like a war against terror?
It seems we already have a great many enemies. Most are not willing to die in an attempt to kill us. Some are.
Past history has shown that Muslims are only stopped by force. What do you suggest?
Policies of appeasement do not appear to be working.
I do not see any reason to bomb Egypt. They seem to have shown that they are allies, even after President Obama has worked against them. I do not see bombers coming from Bangladesh.
We didn’t have the House and the Senate in 2009 and you seriously don’t thing the rats would have gone along with it. Keep on dreaming
We are talking two different things.
In this case, it is clear there were plenty of flags ignored by someone who was nearly completely out of control behavior-wise.
And this is someone who it seems was ignored by people whose job it is to look for people like him.
In the case of people being evaluated for refugee status, one has to consider that if it fails now with a guy jumping up and down in his high school class at the sight of 9/11, completely bugging out his co-workers with his terrorist viewpoints he isn’t hiding from anyone, how likely is it that some bureaucrat with a rubber stamp in his hand is going to be misled by muslim who is not throwing up behavioral flags, but is instead being polite, saying “I abhor violence” and also says things like “Israel is a small country that deserves to exist. We in the Arab world should learn how to co-exist with them” or “I do not believe Sharia Law should be implemented in the United States.”
If someone knows in advance what kind of responses are going to cause a bureaucrat’s eyes to glaze over in boredom and result in the rubber stamp “Approved for refugee status” and what kind of responses are going to cause someone to pick up a phone or send an email for follow-up, it isn’t hard to imagine what someone will say, expecially someone who is not only allowed by his religion to lie, but is encouraged to do so to further the goals of Islam.
It will not work.
What is the failure rate? 5%? 10%? Those don’t seem like outrageous failure rates on the basis of an unscientific process managed by overworked bureaucrats, especially ones who get an email from their bosses:
“Dear State Department/INS Employee:
We will now have a tribunal method of evaluating each and every applicant for immigration. We are not allowed to profile people because of their Muslim religion, so ALL applicants will be subject to this process.
We cannot hire more people, so everyone will be assigned to a team, and you will rotate the tribunal task by team every week. You will, of course, be expected to complete all the other work you are now responsible for, so good luck.
And remember, you must give each candidate the benefit of the doubt, because it is un-American to refuse refugee status because of a small doubt. You must be certain if you refuse, and your denial rates will be evaluated as a result. Good luck!”
So let’s say it is 5% failure rate. That is 5,000 people we let in who want to kill us. Is that too many? What if were only a 1% error rate. Could 1,000 well organized terrorists find a way to kill innocent people?
If one “homegrown terrorist” can kill 50 people, I am certain 1,000 well coordinated people can do far worse.
Exactly.
By the way, this is an aside, but there was a larger massacre than Orlando in 1813 by Alabama “Creek Indians” against whites and westernized Creeks:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Mims_massacre
500 people killed.
But I thought the Indians were so peaceful... /sarc
Obama has failed and must be removed...... now
I’ll take my chances.
That arrogant, lying pos should have never been elected and especially reelected.
Yuck. I feel covered in cooties right now. I owe you one.
I partly agree about Mohammedan sexuality - with the proviso that some of them probably do draw the line between two adult males (whereas a pubescent boy is entirely fair game for the adult male).
As for the homoerotics going back into the closet: irrelevant.
To be a true Mohammedan is to be violently, hatefully angry with all things non-Muslim; only abject capitulation to Islam [”Submission”] will satisfy the Mohammedan Death Cult. (Anyone who is not so is not a true Mohammedan.)
If all homoerotic persons tomorrow disappeared, the Mohammedans would just go to the next item on their To Kill list. Just look at how they are torturing and slaughtering devout Christians in the Middle east; those people are certainly not practicing homoeroticism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.