Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
I'd agree if that involved a MANPAD. But what if they had access to the hardware of the much more advanced 9K33 Osa SAM system, which can engage planes flying at nearly 40,000 feet altitude? If that's the case, the terrorists could easily have brought down TWA Flight 800.
38 posted on 06/13/2016 9:21:53 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88
There are two big pieces of evidence against that scenario:

1. Flight 800 was flying lower than usual through the area that night. It had been ordered to reduce its altitude to make way for a northbound flight into Providence, Rhode Island that was running behind schedule. A terrorist would not possibly have known this advance, when selecting a location to shoot it down.

2. The U.S. government, after months (if not years) of stalling and prevaricating about it, finally admitted that there were naval assets deployed in the area south of Long Island that night to conduct military exercises. The lack of any obvious reaction from these ships (I believe there is documented evidence that they all vacated the area that very night) would run counter to any reasonable reaction to a nearby terrorist attack using a surface-to-air missile -- in other words, the proverbial "dog that didn't bark" scenario.

52 posted on 06/13/2016 9:29:34 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson