Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk; Alberta's Child; scottinoc; jazusamo
I was not attacking Bolton per se in my post, but wondering mightily why he would omit mention of immigration. And I also categorize him as more a neoconservative, and hence his greater inclination to engage in use of the military.

I have admired him in the past, especially when he was at the UN. But why didn't he address the #1 issue? And I realize all aspects of our war with radislam are connected, but there still is a hierarchy.
116 posted on 06/12/2016 9:12:01 PM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: jobim
He didn't address the issue of immigration because he's an open-borders globalist who can't acknowledge what is obvious to everyone who looks at this issue objectively. Calling for U.S. military intervention all over the world in response to a terrorist attack by an American-born mutant from an Afghan family with diplomatic ties to Washington, D.C. is nothing more than an attempt to change the conversation to something that has nothing to do with the problem.

This is what happens when empires die, folks.

130 posted on 06/13/2016 8:57:59 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: jobim
I did not intend to suggest any such thing as to you. I pinged you simply as a courtesy because I was responding to a ping that had been addressed to you.

If being a "neo"conservative has morphed from meaning "elderly former socialist but anti-communist, mostly Jewish, NYC college professors who fled the Democrat Party after McGovern's communists took control" to anyone willing to use the organized force of the United States military with or without a by-your-leave from the "world community," then John Bolton must be the latter form of "neoconservative" and so am I and damned proud of it.

The purpose of the military is to kill our enemies swiftly, efficiently and relentlessly and break his things and confiscate enough assets to pay for every last nickel of expenses incurred in the exercise, get the hell out and repeat as regrettably necessary.

John Bolton's emphasis has always been on armaments, military deployment and thwarting the panty-waisted diployakkers who will sell this country, its people and its BORDERS down the river every time in service to their Chamber of Crony Commerce patrons.

Not every government official needs to be deployed on the border matter. Trump has this right. It is relatively simple. Build the damn wall. Build it ASAP. Close the ports of entry and airports to unauthorized immigration. Stop the infernal demand of the colleges and universities (often domestic enemies) for ever more revenue from foreign students wo come to study, hard sciences while our own often major in sex, drugs and rock 'n roll or ethnic and alternative lifestyle studies. Bolton does not need to reform American misedjamakashun either. Or the tax code. Or the regulatory empire. Spread Bolton too thin and he will, despite his talents, become less effective.

133 posted on 06/13/2016 1:53:11 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson