Skip to comments.
Canada Legalizes Most Sex Acts With Animals [WARNING: Disturbing content]
Christian Post ^
| June 10, 2016
| Stoyan Zaimov
Posted on 06/10/2016 9:03:21 AM PDT by Reverend Wright
Canada's Supreme Court has legalized most sex acts between people and animals, as long as no penetration is involved, in a controversial bestiality ruling that has been slammed by animal rights groups.
The Independent reported that the case involved a British Columbia man, identified as "DLW," who was convicted of 13 counts of sexually assaulting his stepdaughters, but was acquitted of bestiality because he "only" forced dogs into oral sex, without penetration being involved. The man "smeared peanut butter on the genitals of his victims and had the family dog lick it off while he videotaped the act."
(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...
TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bestiality; canada; homosexualagenda; pansexuals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Reverend Wright
Liberals do the sickest things.
41
posted on
06/10/2016 10:04:02 AM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: Vic S
Its psychological warfare.
Yup.
42
posted on
06/10/2016 10:04:40 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: BykrBayb
My comment was that depending upon how the law was written, the action, no matter how reprehensible, may not be considered a criminal act under that law. Allowing bestiality is not correct, but they may have to re-write the law to cover situations like this.
I would have to read the applicable law to see what it said, and a) I don’t have the time and inclination to do so, and b)the acts sicken me and I don’t want to spend much more time on this.
43
posted on
06/10/2016 10:06:33 AM PDT
by
drop 50 and fire for effect
("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
To: Reverend Wright
The Independent reported that the case involved a British Columbia man, identified as "DLW," who was convicted of 13 counts of sexually assaulting his stepdaughters, but was acquitted of bestiality because he "only" forced dogs into oral sex, without penetration being involved. The man "smeared peanut butter on the genitals of his victims and had the family dog lick it off while he videotaped the act.""It's a family act!"
44
posted on
06/10/2016 10:08:02 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Reverend Wright
This was inevitable once they allowed the goat humpers in.
45
posted on
06/10/2016 10:08:26 AM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
To: Reverend Wright
46
posted on
06/10/2016 10:13:04 AM PDT
by
karnage
To: Vic S
I’m beginning to think it *is* psychological warfare: gaslighting, to be specific. They’re trying to get us to doubt *our* sanity (”Can this be happening? It can’t be. It must be me who’s crazy.”)
47
posted on
06/10/2016 10:13:56 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Do the universities stifle writers? I think they don't stifle enough of them. - Flannery O'Connor)
To: Reverend Wright
So a dog orally pleasuring your manhood is not insertion? Does Monica know?
48
posted on
06/10/2016 10:19:17 AM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(#GuiltyAsHELLary2016 #KimJungHill)
To: Reverend Wright
A look at the justices might help explain this ruling...
49
posted on
06/10/2016 10:36:14 AM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(#GuiltyAsHELLary2016 #KimJungHill)
To: ichabod1
Oh no! What if they had peanut allergies?
50
posted on
06/10/2016 10:39:28 AM PDT
by
beelzepug
(For English press #1; for Spanish, learn English and press #1)
To: Reverend Wright; Robert DeLong; Mr Ramsbotham; Pollster1; Gaffer; MinuteGal; Yaelle; al baby; ...
51
posted on
06/10/2016 10:40:51 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Reverend Wright
Dumb question: without penetration?
What did this legalize? Giving a hand job to your pet? Heavy petting?
I’m no farm boy, but I thought that’s how some animal breeding actually takes place.
(And God help me the comments I’m going to get if I’m wrong about that.)
52
posted on
06/10/2016 10:51:27 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: al baby
First Vincent Foster... then Secretary Brown... now Buddy? Where will the carnage end???
53
posted on
06/10/2016 10:52:17 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: OrangeHoof
You know, my biggest problem with that picture is that they’re impersonating patriarchs.
(Yeah. if that looks a little like Saint Nicholas, it’s because he was traditionally pictured in his bishop’s robes. When Santa was secularized, they toned down the religious dress a little.)
54
posted on
06/10/2016 10:54:06 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: beelzepug
55
posted on
06/10/2016 10:54:36 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: Reverend Wright
Catabolic now changing migration habits.
56
posted on
06/10/2016 11:01:13 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stutter)
To: Reverend Wright
Is it because of muslims?
57
posted on
06/10/2016 11:21:27 AM PDT
by
Trillian
To: Gaffer
Maybe at the time, BJ Clinton would have referred to his cat as:"Sucks".
58
posted on
06/10/2016 11:46:49 AM PDT
by
gigster
(Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
To: fruser1
heavy-petting zoo. Now, that's very funny. May I use it?
59
posted on
06/10/2016 11:49:40 AM PDT
by
gigster
(Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
To: MarchonDC09122009
Yuri Bezmenov Predicted this very thing over thirty years ago.
60
posted on
06/10/2016 11:53:18 AM PDT
by
gigster
(Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson