Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CedarDave
Thanks for the reply. That helps a lot.

But still, the court did not rule that concealed carry is illegal, only that it is not required. Correct?

101 posted on 06/10/2016 7:36:51 AM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Da Bilge Troll
But still, the court did not rule that concealed carry is illegal, only that it is not required. Correct?

The way the 2nd amendment works (or should work), the right to keep and bear arms automatically allows concealed carry (subject to certain common-sense checks, not a felon or insane for example). What California did, and the Federal court concurred in, is that you have to prove you have a need to carry and the decision is completely up to the local sheriff. It's as if the you were arrested for a crime and instead of the presumption of innocence, you were already presumed guilty until you prove your innocence. The court has turned the 2nd amendment on its head.

106 posted on 06/10/2016 9:41:54 AM PDT by CedarDave (Obama's America - where the criminals are victims and the police are the criminals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson