Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyDancer

Can’t find 12 million illegals, how’re they going to find 110 million guns plus billions of rounds of ammunition?

********************************************************

There’s a critical difference in those two scenarios .... they do NOT want to find the illegals .... they WILL want to confiscate guns/ammo.


6 posted on 06/07/2016 7:39:52 AM PDT by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Qiviut

they WILL want to confiscate guns/ammo

Like the Safety act in NY state refuse to comply.

And let them know!

What are the implications,? hey it has to work for the working guy does it not??

Oh....they cannot possibly round up all the illegals and their anchor babies but gun owners will be sought out?

I dunno will we not comply if it means our loved ones?

What a fence....no not that one.


8 posted on 06/07/2016 7:46:33 AM PDT by Uversabound (Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Qiviut

Thing to do is have a couple of old garbage .22 rifles around and if/when they start going door to door to confiscate firearms just say “Here ya go and have a nice day” ...


12 posted on 06/07/2016 7:52:54 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Qiviut; SkyDancer

“There’s a critical difference in those two scenarios .... they do NOT want to find the illegals .... they WILL want to confiscate guns/ammo.”


There’s an ancient Chinese saying that advises one to “be careful what you wish for, you may get it.” I’d say that this applies to the fantasy of attempting to disarm the American people like Australia did with its folks a few years ago. It might work as a purely academic exercise, with assinine assumptions that don’t get tested in the real world, but when you actually put those assumptions to the test...they might not work out so well.

FYI, there are about 400 million guns, not 110 million. http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/09/us-will-reach-400-million-private.html That latter figure might be approximately the number of gun OWNERS.

Oh, BTW, Clinton and her crew have obviously not gamed what happens to the US economy if you suddenly remove a few million highly productive, non-welfare-taking, people from the workforce (by killing or imprisoning them). Here’s a hint - the economy tanks, immmediately. Removing just 5% of them, some 5.5 million taxpayers, would have devastating consequences. Plus you’d have the families of those people who would have blood in their eyes, and do everything in their power to gum up the works, economically and otherwise. Plus, this doesn’t consider what even 1% of those gun owners (1.1 million people) could do to the nation’s commerce - like, for example, threatening to set up ambushes for 18-wheelers on major interstates from “flyover” country into the coastal cities. There wouldn’t have to be one shot fired, not one person wounded or killed, and many hundreds of thousands of truckers would simply say, “Nope, I ain’t going, no one can make me.” Let’s see how the coastal shitties do without a lot of food, fuel, etc., etc.


42 posted on 06/07/2016 9:33:31 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson