Hillary to be Indicted?

Huff Post ^ | 5/29 | Huff Post

[TangledUpInBlue]

Ok, so Huff Post put this up yesterday on their website and then took it down without comment after about 30 minutes. But, not before it got archived.

[Popman]

——Everybody is wasting so much energy on Hillary getting indicted, Absolutely no chance of that happening——

Will Hillary ever see the inside of a federal prison? ....never going to happen....

Her subordinates will fall on their swords first...

That being said, she needs to be held accountable as an example if for any reason...

Another obvious reason, she can never see the inside of the WH again, so even if she will not be indicted, every rock should be turned over exposing the dark corners of the Clinton Crime machine

[thinden]

Yes. Noticed the article indicates bubba is up to his gills in the grift.

It also ties in hildabest victory fund to the scam.

This is the first time i’ve noticed these two tied in to possible charges.

Obammy has been mentioned as possibly being involved. In some of the missing emails, but again for me for me. Bubba. & HVF is news

[mikey_hates_everything]

I noticed. Also, that the form says to format it as mm-dd-yyyy. Just can never follow rules.

[Cats Pajamas]

Not likely she will burn for anything when she has so much dope on everyone else. Everyone in the D.C. fishbowl is compromised and can be blackmailed that is why they were chosen and placed in office. Otherwise they would be of no use to the powers that be to do what they want done. If Leona Helmsley could see what that Clinton witch is getting away with she would jump up out of her grave,snatch Hillary bald-headed and beat her to death with her purse.

[mountainlion]

It is a shot across the bow to demonicRats to warn of things in progress. It could be a warning of things to come.

[The_Media_never_lie]

And I will win the lottery!.......

[GreenHornet]

No No No not yet! Wait for October when they are in too deep to do anything about her indictment!

Don't wait. Indict her now. Waiting until October is too risky. The sooner we get rid of Hillary, the better.

[mad_as_he$$]

4) Hillary only broke the rules.

This line is being tested for the last four days. She will get a reprimand and then on to best the pResident.

[Señor Presidente]

The date format caught my eye as well.

Quite odd, given that the form specifies DD-MM-YYYY.

[darkwing104]

If Hillary is Indicted, most likely she will have a sudden medical condition which will force her out of the Presidential race.

Obama will pardon her out of humanity, too save his own sorry butt. The FBI's creditability will be damaged but will survive.

[Procyon]

Disqualification from office does not include president or Vice President, Senator or member of Congress. Qualifications for those offices are set forth in the Constitution and can only be changed by constitutional amendment not legislation.

[Iron Munro]

[Aliska]

Factcheck.org which is known for partiality to the left imo has dissected all her lies and spinning. It's a handy reference as a companion to the IG report. Believe it or not, Hillary still maintained on May 26 after the report became public that it was allowed.

Factcheck - IG Report on Clinton's Emails

It occurred to me that the FBI could seek some other avenue to deal with the results of the investigation. I don't see how they can really give her a green light especially in view of the evidence that has already come to light in the IG report.

The matter of the other devices she used to access her email account have been pretty much glossed over by officialdom, but each by itself posed a security risk by hackers or just plain spillovers anywhere in the outgoing or incoming data streams along the routing paths, apart from the server. And we are talking worldwide communications in a large percentage of her work.

There are probably more findings. Unless ordered to wrap it up, they pretty much have to pursue every avenue that has opened to them from all the information they have recovered and where it has led. It is possible it is such a tangled mess that they hit dead ends they can't penetrate because evidence has been destroyed. You can bet people involved peripherally have been scrambling to cover their tracks if possible.

As previously believed or assumed, Colin Powell did not surrender all his emails used on his private email account - not server - and the ISP has been contacted in an effort to determine if those emails have been archived on their servers and be turned over. I wasn't sure what to make of that when I read it. It's in a summary compiled by the Washington Post from the IG report:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/25/here-are-the-most-critical-parts-of-the-state-dept-inspector-general-report-on-clintons-email-use/

I found it a very informative summary and alternative to plowing through the 80 some pages of the IG report itself.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

4. He published an opinion piece on the case for why she should be indicted but titled it as if she was going to be. So they pulled it.

[Lizavetta]

Spot on. But you left out vast right wing conspiracy.

[txrefugee]

The Left really loves the unvarnished Socialism of Sanders. They’d love to have Elizabeth Warren, riding to the rescue at the Dem convention as the Leftist Joan of Arc.

[Buckeye Battle Cry]

Trump would pummel Liawatha with proof of socialism failures. Just look at Venezuela.

As for Hillary, it would be a dream come true to watch her get burned and go scorched Earth on the left for turning on her.

[ecomcon]

Did anyone else notice she writes the date European style (22-01-2009)? Does she think she’s a Queen or something?

So cosmopolitan. So citizen-of-the-world.

She, Obama, and Sanders are all America haters.

[OKSooner]

" “Hillary Clinton is guilty of exposing classified documents to foreign governments by placing them illegally on her server, of sending and receiving classified documents and conspiring with her staff to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by avoiding the use of the State Department run servers. Some of the documents were so highly classified the the investigators on the case weren’t even able to examine the material themselves until they got their own clearances raised to the highest levels.”

Assuming this is an excerpt, I can see why it was taken down. They're inviting a lawsuit for libel with the fourth word in the first sentence.

Don't get me wrong, I'm inclined be believe she's guilty of this and very much more evil, but still, in this country, even an evil b!+c# like Hillary Clinton is entitled to a trial before a jury of her peers before that word is used with her name.

So I say HuffPo knows something, and published it, and because of an inappropriate choice of words were obliged to take it down. All because they omitted the word "alleged".

[Sequoyah101]

I see one scenario, did hell call? Is it freezing over?