[miss marmelstein]

The very first sentence is so full of lies it renders the rest of the article INOPERATIVE.

[Former Proud Canadian]

I got a little over halfway through. I don’t have the time to list all the misstatements of fact. I don’t know how people can read this drivel.

[KevinB]

The very first sentence is so full of lies it "NY Times" under the title renders the rest of the article INOPERATIVE.

There, fixed it for ya! :-)

[AustinBill]

The real story is not what's in the article but the fact that DNC official mouthpieces like the New York Times and Washington Post are starting to raise these sort of questions at all instead of running interference for her, as would be expected if her grip on the party were as secure as she'd have the public believe.

One can only imagine the behind-the-scenes maneuvering going on. Really, the only thing Hillary has going for is the threat to take down as many others with her (starting with Obama) if she's brought down. That's the only calculus that will matter between know and the convention. The D angst is whether they can force her out with minimal damage or have to acquiesce to her going down in flames in the general and try to salvage what they can for the next 4 or 8 years under Trump.